Advertisment Polium-B
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
An open access publication of ISCCM™ 
Users online: 1246 
     Home | Login 
  About Current Issue Archive Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact  
 » Next article
 » Previous article 
 » Table of Contents
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (56 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 »  Results
 »  Discussion
 »  Conclusion
 »  References

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded529    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2007  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 109-111

Feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneus endoscopic gastrostomy on ventilated patients in ICU

Dept of Critical Care, Dept of Surgery and Endoscopy, Lokmanya Hospital Chinchwad, Pune, India

Correspondence Address:
L V Pillai
Plot No. 82, Sector 26, Pradhikaran, Nigdi, Pune
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.35082

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

An audit of 27 ventilated patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in ICU revealed that this procedure could be safely performed in the ICU under local anesthesia. None of the patients had any hemodynamic or respiratory complications. All of them could be started on enteral feeds on the following day. PEG done in the ICU avoids the complications of transportation to the operation theater and general anesthesia.

Keywords: Intensive care unit, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), safety

How to cite this article:
Date S V, Pillai L V, Vaidya V G, Vaidya N V, Hussainy S. Feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneus endoscopic gastrostomy on ventilated patients in ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2007;11:109-11

How to cite this URL:
Date S V, Pillai L V, Vaidya V G, Vaidya N V, Hussainy S. Feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneus endoscopic gastrostomy on ventilated patients in ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med [serial online] 2007 [cited 2018 May 23];11:109-11. Available from:

 » Introduction Top

Despite early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, noscomial infections are an important poor prognostic factor in the ICU patients on ventilator. [1],[2],[3] Early enteral feeds are associated with better outcomes but the association of nasogastric feeds with increased incidence of noscomial pneumonia has offset this advantage. [4],[5] The conventional approach to enteral access is to use nasogastric or nasojejunal tubes, but these not only cause gastroesophageal junction to be incompetent but also bacteria are known to migrate along the tube into the throat and ultimately into the respiratory passages. [4],[5],[6] Surgical gastrostomy overcame this complication but required transportation to Operation Theater and risks of anesthesia. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) was introduced in 1980 as an alternative to laparotomy for placement of a gastrostomy tube. [7]

The common indications for PEG are patients likely to need prolonged mechanical ventilation and or tube feeding either due to trauma, head injury, stroke or neurological disease.

As invasive surgery requires the patient to be transported to the operation theater which usually acts as a deterrent for non-life saving surgery in ICUs we decided to study the feasibility, safety and efficacy of bedside PEG procedure in seriously ill, ventilated patients avoiding the risks of anesthesia and transportation.[8],[9]

 » Materials and Methods Top

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data. Twenty-seven ventilated patients, who underwent PEG in the ICU between April 2002 to April 2006, formed the study group. PEG was performed in the ICU using Freka PEG set 20 F, under local anesthesia. Gastroscope was passed and stomach was distended with air. Once trans-illumination was seen, trochar with canula was introduced per abdomen into the stomach followed by the thread, which was pulled out through the mouth. PEG catheter was attached to it, pulled out through the anterior abdominal wall and fixed. Incidents like bleeding, abdominal distension were monitored. Feeding was started within 24h of the procedure.

 » Results Top


There were 21 males and six females with ages ranging from 18 to 74 years. Twenty-four patients had head injury while three had spontaneous intracranial bleed. All the 27 patients were ventilated and on Ryles tube feeding prior to PEG. Average ventilator days and ICU stay prior to PEG were eight days. Nine patients had Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) before PEG.

Twenty-five patients had tracheostomy while two patients had air way accessed with endotracheal tubes. Procedure time averaged eight minutes. Two patients with endotracheal tubes had their cuffs deflated to enable a smoother passage of PEG tube and hence the procedure time was few minutes longer. All the patients were hemodynamically stable and maintained saturation throughout the procedure.

Eighteen patients were weaned from ventilator and shifted out of ICU in 48h. All nine patients who had VAP required further ICU stay up to an average of nine days following the procedure, but none developed further episodes of VAP. No complications such as bleeding, perforation of viscous (other than stomach), pneumoperitoneum or peritonitis were seen during or following the procedure.

Enteral feeds were started after 24h in all patients and were well-tolerated.

No complications like bleeding, peritonitis and abdominal distension were observed in any of the 27 patients in immediate post procedure period. Longest follow up was for 60 days. Days on PEG feeding ranged from 40 to 60 days. No long-term complications were observed. One patient had minor wound infection and was treated with local dressings.

 » Discussion Top

Our study shows PEG to be a safe bedside procedure even for ventilated patients and therefore can be easily performed in ICU. The short procedure time, use of local anesthesia for the procedure did not add to the morbidity in our patients. These findings are comparable to that in other studies. [7],[8],[9]

Despite studies showing early gastrostomy to reduce the incidence of VAP, invasive procedures in ICU patients are usually differed for the additional risk involved. We found that PEG procedure was safe and could be performed in the ICU under local anesthesia, involved no transportation of ventilated patients, none developed hemodynamic compromise or desaturation during the procedure. Enteral feeds could be started within 24h in all patients thereby eliminating the need for expensive parenteral feedings and its associated complications.

Our study showed eighteen of the twenty-seven patients studied could be shifted out of the ICU within 48h suggesting an influence on the length of ICU stay. There were no cases of VAP in any of the patients following the procedure. Patients who had VAP prior to the procedure did not develop any additional complications and could be weaned off the ventilator in the next four to nine days.

Complications of PEG are infrequent, with a mortality rate of 0.3 % and morbidity rate of 3-5% in the largest reported series. [7],[8] A recent literature review of PEG cites an overall complication rate of 17% with only 3% regarded as serious. Reported complications include wound infection, peritonitis, septicaemia, peristomal leakage, tube dislodgement, aspiration, bowel perforation and gastro colic fistula. [10],[11],[12] No patient in our series showed the above-mentioned complications. Our longest followed-up patient till date is a case of severe head injury on PEG feeds for last nine months and has no complications. Presently for long-term patients skin level buttons are available which can replace the protruding tube once the stoma matures. As seen in other studies long-term follow-ups, including the procedure for removal of PEG did not result in any complication. [12]

An absolute contraindication to PEG is the inability to bring the anterior wall of stomach in apposition to the anterior abdominal wall. Therefore patients with prior subtotal gastrectomy, ascites or marked hepatomegaly and obesity will require careful evaluation to be sure that the stomach and abdominal wall can be brought together with gastric insufflation. Coagulation defects if correctable are not a contraindication for the procedure. [13]

Kostdema E and colleagues as well as Ibrahim et al . showed very early PEG done on the day of intubations to significantly reduce the incidence of VAP when compared to patients on nasogastric feedings. [10],[11] In our cases early PEG was not done as a result the influence of PEG on incidence of VAP in our group of patients cannot be commented upon . As we have seen in our study that PEG is a safe bedside procedure. Future prospective studies can evaluate the influence of early PEG on incidence of VAP in our ICUs.

 » Conclusion Top

PEG is suited particularly for patients who have an increased risk of transportation and surgery under general anesthesia. It can be safely performed in ICU as a bedside procedure in ventilated patients and probably helps in reducing the ICU stay.

 » References Top

1.Chastre J, Fagon JY. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Care Med 2002;165:867-903.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Langer M, Mosconi P, Cigada M, Mandelli M. Long-term respiratory support and risk of pneumonia in critically ill patients. Intensive care unit group of infection control. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140:302-5.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Cook DJ, Walter SD, Cook RJ, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH, Leasa D, et al . Incidence of and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:433-40.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Teramto S, Ishii T, Yamamoto H, Yamaguchi Y, Ouchi Y. Nasogastric tube feeding is a cause of aspiration pneumonia in ventilated patients. Eur Respir J 2006;27:436-8.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Kuo B, Castell DO. The effect of nasogastric intubation on gastroesophageal reflux: A comparison of different tube sizes. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1804-7.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.DeMeo MT, Bruninga K. Physiology of the aerodigestive system and aberrations in that system resulting in aspiration. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002;26:S9-17.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: A percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:872-5.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1981;27:9-11.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Kollef MH, Von Harz B, Prentice D, Shapiro SD, Silver P, St John R, et al . Patient transport from from intensive care units increases the of developing ventiltor-associated pneumonia. Chest 1997;112:765-73.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.Kostodima E, Kaditis AG, Alexopoulos EI, Zakynthinos E, Sfyras D. Early gastrostomy reduces the rate of ventilator -associated pneumonia in stroke or head injured patients. Eur Resir J 2005;26:106-11.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Ibrahim EH, Mehringer L, Prentice D, Sherman G, Schaiff R, Fraser V, et al . Early versus late enteral feeding of mechanically ventilated patients: results of a clinical trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002;26:174-81.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Hull MA, Rawlings J, Murray FE, Field J, McIntyre AS, Mahida YR, et al . Audit of outcome of longterm enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Lancet 1993;341:869-72.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  
13.Stroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut 2003;52:vii1-12.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 7th April '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow