Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
An open access publication of ISCCM™ 
 
Users online: 20 
     Home | Login 
  About Current Issue Archive Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Etcetera Contact  
  NAVIGATE Here 
  Search
 
  
 RESOURCE Links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (835 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free) 

  IN THIS Article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Results
 » Discussion
 » Conclusions
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2002    
    Printed105    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded370    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 17-21

Thrombosis associated with right internal jugular central venous catheters: A prospective observational study


1 Department of Critical Care, Yashoda Hospital, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, India
2 Department of Radiodiagnosis, Yashoda Hospital, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, India

Date of Web Publication29-Mar-2012

Correspondence Address:
S Manimala Rao
AMCU, Yashoda Hospital, Somajiguda, Hyderabad
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.94419

Get Permissions


 » Abstract 

Background and Aims: Central venous catheters (CVC) are essential in a critical care setting. Thrombosis is one of the very important associated complications that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of thrombosis in right-sided internal jugular vein (IJV) CVC with the help of color Doppler duplex sonography, its extent, risk factors and clinical impact. Materials and Methods: One hundred consecutive patients having right-sided IJV CVC were included in the study. Color Doppler sonography was performed on the 3 rd and 6 th days after CVC insertion. The size of the thrombus was noted. Presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension or smoking was noted. Presence of any hypertonic solution and thromboprophylaxis for Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were also noted. Results: Thrombus was detected in 33 of 100 (33.0%) patients. The incidence in males was 32.86% and in females was 33.33%. Males had a significantly higher incidence of small thrombus (P = 0.05), whereas females had a significantly higher incidence of large thrombus (P = 0.05). DVT thromboprophylaxis was not effective for CVC-related thrombosis. Hypertonic solution, presence of diabetes, hypertension or history of smoking did not increase the risk of thrombosis. Conclusion: CVC-related thrombosis is common and has the potential for serious complications. Females appear to be at a higher risk for larger thrombus formation. DVT thromboprophylaxis does not confer protection for CVC-related thrombosis. Color Doppler duplex sonography provides with an easily available, noninvasive means of detecting a thrombus. More studies are needed to establish a consensus for prophylaxis and treatment of asymptomatic CVC-related thrombosis.


Keywords: Central venous catheter, internal jugular vein, thrombosis


How to cite this article:
Kujur R, Rao S M, Badwaik G, Paraswani R. Thrombosis associated with right internal jugular central venous catheters: A prospective observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2012;16:17-21

How to cite this URL:
Kujur R, Rao S M, Badwaik G, Paraswani R. Thrombosis associated with right internal jugular central venous catheters: A prospective observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med [serial online] 2012 [cited 2014 Apr 18];16:17-21. Available from: http://www.ijccm.org/text.asp?2012/16/1/17/94419



 » Introduction Top


Central venous catheters (CVCs) have an essential part to play in the management of a critically ill patient. They are useful for hemodynamic monitoring, for administration of specific medications like vasoactive drugs, parenteral nutrition and for hemodialysis. These are associated with substantial risks of complications, which can be mechanical, septic and thrombotic. [1] Upper limb DVT is a well known complication of thrombosis associated with CVCs, which, in its fatal form, can sometimes lead to life-threatening pulmonary embolism.­ [2] The incidence of thrombosis varies from 1.9% in subclavian CVCs to 21.5% in femoral catheters.­ [3] The incidence is higher in patients with malignancy and in those with hemodialysis catheters. The risk of thrombosis associated with IJV catheters is estimated to be four-times higher than that with subclavian catheters.­ [4] Sixty-six percent of the patients with internal jugular vein (IJV) catheters have evidence of thrombus formation either on ultrasound or on autopsy. [5]

This was a prospective observational study. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of thrombosis associated with right-sided IJV catheters, the extent of thrombosis, its clinical implications and to relate it with the pharmacological prophylaxis for DVT.


 » Materials and Methods Top


One hundred consecutive adult patients admitted to our Critical Care Unit, who had right-sided IJV catheters placed for various indications, were included in the study. Informed consent and institutional review board approval was taken. Certofix B Braun CVCs were used every time. CVCs placed with a maximum of two attempts with ease were only included. CVCs were flushed every 2 h with heparinized saline.

CVC insertion was performed by intensivists or doctors having at least 5 years of experience in CVC insertion. Color Doppler sonography was performed by a consultant radiologist.

Color Doppler sonography was done on the 3 rd and 6 th days of catheter placement. Presence and size of the thrombus was noted. Local signs of inflammation and any clinical signs of upper limb DVT or pulmonary embolism, if any, were noted.

Patient's previous comorbidities were noted. Among the medications, presence of pharmacological prophylaxis for DVT, presence of parenteral nutrition and other medications like mannitol and hypertonic saline were noted.

Patients with diagnosed or suspected malignancy, those with diagnosed prothrombotic states and those having hemodialysis catheters in IJV were excluded from the study.


 » Results Top


Among the patients enrolled in our study, there were 70 males and 30 females. There was evidence of thrombus in 33 patients in color Doppler duplex sonography (33.0%). In males, thrombus was found in 23 of 70 patients (32.86%) and in females thrombus was present in 10 of 30 patients (33.33%). There was no difference in the incidence of thrombosis among males and females. The overall incidence was 165.83 per 1000 catheter-days. The incidence in males was 158.62 per 1000 catheter-days and in females 185.18 per 1000 catheter-days.

We categorized the thrombus arbitrarily into three groups: small, medium and large, depending on the size of the thrombus. Small thrombus was just around the catheter, medium-sized thrombus was up to 4 mm in diameter and the large-sized thrombus was more than 4 mm in diameter. In 15 patients the thrombus was small, in nine it was medium sized and in nine it was large. [Figure 1]a, b and c show the different sized thrombi on vascular doppler studies. The incidence of different sizes of thrombus in males and females has been shown below [Table 1]. The incidence of small-sized thrombus was significantly higher in males (P = 0.05) and the incidence of large-sized thrombus was significantly higher in females (P = 0.05).
Figure 1a: Small thrombus in the right internal jugular vein
Figure 1b: Medium-sized thrombus in the right internal jugular vein


Click here to view
Table 1: Incidence of CVC-related thrombus in males and females

Click here to view


Of 33 patients found to be having thrombus, in 21 (63.64%) it was detected on the third day after CVC insertion, whereas in 12 patients (36.36%) it was detected on the sixth day. The catheter was removed if the thrombus was large. The patients having large thrombus were followed-up. If the thrombus was small or medium sized, then it was observed and followed-up with a color Doppler sonography after 3 days.

Of 33 patients, 24 had low molecular weight heparin as part of the DVT prophylaxis and nine did not have the same due to some medical contraindications.

None of the patient had total vessel occlusion or pulmonary embolism.

We did not find any significant effect of hypertonic solutions including mannitol and 3% saline as a risk factor for thrombus formation. We did not find diabetes mellitus, hypertension or smoking as increasing the risk of thrombus formation.


 » Discussion Top


CVCs are crucial in the management of most of the critically ill patients. They provide an important invasive tool for hemodynamic monitoring. They also allow delivery of certain medications and nutrition to the patient safely. As a result, CVC insertion is one of the most frequently performed invasive procedures in the intensive care unit. Unfortunately, their use is associated with many untoward complications, which increases the morbidity of the patient and can be life threatening.

More than 15% of the patients receiving CVCs have complications. [3],[6] Hirsch and coworkers detected the prevalence of DVT in critically ill patients to be 33% with the help of ultrasonography and color Doppler imaging.­ [7] They also noted that among these, 15% were related to CVCs. Merrer and colleagues found the incidence of CVC-associated thrombosis to be 1.9% in the subclavian route and 21.5% in the femoral route.

The incidence of thrombosis is studied extensively in patients with hematological and other malignancies. A review showed that in such patients, the incidence of asymptomatic CVC-related thrombosis varied from 1.5 to 34.1% and that of symptomatic thrombosis from 1.2 to 13%. [8] Another review found that the prevalence of CVC-related upper torso deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic cancer patients varies from 11.7 to 44%, whereas in symptomatic patients it varies from 6.7 to 48%. [9] There have been some studies on catheter-related thrombosis in patients having hemodialysis catheter in situ. Terrence and colleagues found the evidence of right IJV thrombus in 25.9% of the patients. [10] Apart from patients with hematological and other malignancies as well as those having hemodialysis cannula, the incidence of CVC-related thrombosis and its clinical impact have not been studied well. In this study, we found the incidence of catheter-related thrombosis in right-sided IJV catheter to be 33.0%.

The etiology of thrombosis associated with CVCs can be explained on the basis of Virchow's triad of endothelial damage, altered blood flow and hypercoagulability. Vessel endothelium damage can be due to various factors including mechanical injury during the process of CVC insertion, number of vein punctures as well as irritation of endothelium by hypertonic solutions and drugs. [11],[12]

Within hours after insertion of the catheter there is deposition of platelets around the CVCs, reaching its peak in 3-4 h. [13] This is followed by formation of a sleeve around the CVC, which is an adherent coating of fibrin and collagen. The formation of sleeve is reported to occur in up to 47% of the catheters. [14],[15] The fibrin sleeve in itself is benign, but promotes infection and may lead to thrombus formation.

Mural thrombosis can lead to subtotal stenosis or occlusion of vessel lumen leading to clinical manifestation of thrombosis and its complication. Manifestations also depend on whether thrombus is infected or not. Pulmonary embolism occurred in approximately 12% in most series. [2] Uncomplicated or noninfected cases present with pain and swelling in the neck and a cord can be palpated beneath the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Tovi et al. described the following clinical manifestation in a large series of patients with septic IJV thrombosis: fever (83%), leucocytosis (78%), cervical pain (66%), neck swelling (72%), cord sign (39%), sepsis syndrome (39%), pleuropulmonary complications (28%), superior vena cava syndrome (11%), chylothorax (5%) and jugular foramen syndrome (6%). [16]

There are several risk factors identified that can potentiate thrombus formation. They are thrombogenecity of the catheter material, circumferential size of the catheter, catheter tip position, side of insertion, puncture site of insertion, multiple venipuncture attempts, composition of infusate, thrombophilic abnormalities, CVC-related infection and duration of catheter placement. [8],[13]

Borow and Crowley studied the adhesion of Chromium-51-labeled platelets to the different CVC materials and found that the least thrombogenic catheters were hydromer-coated polyurethane catheters.

The position of the catheter tip is an important risk factor for thrombosis. The incidence of CVC - related thrombosis is found to be higher in patients in whom the catheter tip is placed in the innominate vein or proximal superior vena cava as compared with the distal superior vena cava/right atrial junction. [17],[18] Tesselaar et al. showed a 2.6-fold higher risk when the catheter was located in the superior vena cava compared with the right atrium. [19]

Other important risk factors are side of insertion of the catheter and puncture site of CVC. Tesselaar et al. also showed that the placement of CVC on the left side was associated with a 3.5-times higher risk of thrombosis as compared with the right side. In children, the incidence of catheter-related thrombosis was 44% in subclavian vein CVCs compared with 20% in jugular vein CVCs.­ [20] This difference in the relative risk can be possibly explained by the anatomy of the venous system in the upper torso. As compared with the right side, the left brachiocephalic vein is longer and has a more horizontal course, leading to a sharper angle to the superior vena cava. Further, compared with the jugular CVCs, the subclavian CVCs follow a sharper curve into the superior vena cava, facilitating wall adherence. The subclavian CVCs enter where the vein passes between the clavicle and the first rib, which may cause vein compression and kinking of the CVC.

CVC-related infection is also an important risk factor that can lead to increased propensity for thrombus formation. Van Rooden et al . showed an increased incidence of CVC-associated thrombosis in patients with CVC-related infection as compared with those without infection in a population of patients with hematological malignancy. [21] There seems to be a bidirectional relationship between CVC-related infection and thrombosis. [8] The major contributing factor for both of them is the formation of a fibrin sheath around the catheter. Microorganisms like Staphylococcus aureus and Staph. epidermidis easily adhere to the fibrin sheath. They also produce a coagulase enzyme that enhances the thrombogenic process. [22] On the other hand, thrombin has been shown to upregulate many proinflammatory mediators in vitro.[23]

Contrast venography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of upper limb DVT. But, it can dislodge the thrombus and cause embolism. Other modalities used to diagnose upper limb DVT are computed tomography scan with contrast, magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine scan. [24] Color Doppler duplex sonography is an noninvasive, safe and convenient means of diagnosing upper limb DVT and CVC-related thrombus. A systematic review of studies reported a sensitivity of compression ultrasound ranging from 56 to 100% and a specificity of 94-100% for the diagnosis of upper limb DVT. [25]

It still remains a matter of debate whether antithrombotic prophylaxis is effective in preventing CVC-related thrombosis. There have been studies using unfractionated heparin, minidose warfarin and low molecular weight heparin for antithrombotic prophylaxis but, due to lack of well-designed prospective studies, it still remains a matter of debate. [8]

The management of patients who develop a CVC-related thrombosis is not standardized. Treatment strategies consist of thrombolytic therapy, initiation of systemic anticoagulation, removal of the catheter or both. For CVC-related thrombosis, the preferred treatment is a combination of low molecular weight heparin followed by oral anticoagulant for 3-6 months, but no prospective randomized studies have been published on this subject. [26],[27]


 » Conclusions Top


CVC-related thrombosis is common. It appears to be more common in patients with hematological and other malignancies and in patients having hemodialysis cannula in situ. Many risk factors have been identified in different studies that have a strong association with thrombus formation. In this study, those patients who had CVC in the right IJV were only included. Females had significantly higher risk of developing larger thrombus than males. Males had a significantly higher incidence of small-sized thrombus. In 63.64% patients, the thrombus could be detected on the 3 rd day after CVC placement. The low molecular weight heparin used for DVT prophylaxis was not effective in preventing the CVC-related thrombus. The risk of thrombosis was not increased with the use of hypertonic solutions or with the presence of factors like diabetes mellitus, hypertension and history of smoking. There is no consensus regarding management of asymptomatic CVC-related thrombus, and more prospective randomized studies are required. Till then, knowledge of the different risk factors for the thrombus, its prevention and effective treatment of CVC-related infection remains the mainstay to avoid CVC-related thrombosis and its dreaded complications.

 
 » References Top

1.McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1123-33.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Horattas MC, Wright DJ, Fenton AH, Evans DM, Oddi MA, Kamienski RW, et al. Changing concepts of deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity - Report of a series and review of the literature. Surgery 1988;104:561-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, Lefrant JY, Raffy B, Barre E, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286:700-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM, Martin JB, Misset B, Renaud B et al. Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients: incidence, risk factors, and relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest 1998;114:207-13.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Hübsch PJ, Stiglbauer RL, Schwaighofer BW, Kainberger FM, Barton PP. Internal jugular and subclavian vein thrombosis caused by central venous catheters. Evaluation using Doppler blood flow imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:629-36.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S. Central vein catheterization: failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:259-61.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Hirsch DR, Ingenito EP, Goldhaber SZ. Prevalence of deep venous thrombosis among patients in medical intensive care. JAMA 1995;274:335-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Boersma RS, Jie KS, Verbon A, van Pampus EC, Schouten HC. Thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Oncol 2008;19:433-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Haim N, Brenner B. Prevalence of Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Diagnosed by Color Doppler Duplex Sonography in Cancer Patients With Central Venous Catheters. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1297-303.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Wilkin TD, Kraus MA, Lane KA, Trerotola SO. Internal jugular vein thrombosis associated with hemodialysis catheters. Radiology 2003;228:697-700.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Lee AY, Levine MN, Butler G, Webb C, Costantini L, Gu C, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of catheter-related thrombosis in adult patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1404-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR, Bothe A Jr, Benotti PN, Arkin CF et al. Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters. A randomized prospective trial. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:423-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.KS Au. Deep venous thrombosis of upper extremity after central venous cannulation. J Hong Kong Geriatr Soc 1993;1:44-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Martin C, Viviand X, Saux P, Gouin F. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis after central venous catheterization via the axillary vein. Crit Care Med 1999;27:2626-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Xiang DZ, Verbeken EK, Van Lommel AT, Stas M, De Wever I. Composition and formation of the sleeve enveloping a central venous catheter. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:260-71.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Tovi F, Fliss DM, Gatot A, Hertzanu Y. Septic jugular thrombosis with abscess formation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:682-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Eastridge BJ, Lefor AT. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:233-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Luciani A, Clement O, Halimi P, Goudot D, Portier F, Bassot V, et al. Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on Doppler US. Radiology 2001;220:655-60.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Tesselaar ME, Ouwerkerk J, Nooy MA, Rosendaal FR, Osanto S. Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2253-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Male C, Chait P, Andrew M, Hanna K, Julian J, Mitchell L. Central venous line-related thrombosis in children: association with central venous line location and insertion technique. Blood 2003;101:4273-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.van Rooden CJ, Schippers EF, Barge RM, Rosendaal FR, Guiot HF, van der Meer FJ, et al. Infectious complications of central venous catheters increase the risk of catheter-related thrombosis in hematology patients: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2655-60.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Mehall JR, Saltzman DA, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Fibrin sheath enhances central venous catheter infection. Crit Care Med 2002;30:908-12.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Levi M, Van der Poll T, Buller HR. Bidirectional relation between inflammation and coagulation. Circulation 2004;109:2698-704.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Jonas NE, Fagan JJ. Internal Jugular Vein Thrombosis: A Case Study and Review of the Literature. Internet J Otorhinolaryngol 2007;6:2.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Mustafa BO, Rathbun SW, Whitsett TL, Raskob GE. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:401-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Buller HR, Agnelli G, Hull RD, Hyers TM, Prins MH, Raskob GE. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126(3 Suppl):401S-28S.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Karabay O, Yetkin U, Onol H. Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: clinical and treatment characteristics. J Int Med Res 2004;32:429-35.  Back to cited text no. 27
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Central venous catheter care for the patient with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline
Schiffer, C.A. and Mangu, P.B. and Wade, J.C. and Camp-Sorrell, D. and Cope, D.G. and El-Rayes, B.F. and Gorman, M. and Ligibel, J. and Mansfield, P. and Levine, M.
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013; 31(10): 1357-1370
[Pubmed]
2 Trombosis y obstrucción asociadas a vías venosas centrales. Incidencia y factores de riesgo
A. Vivanco Allende,C. Rey Galán,M.V. Rodríguez de la Rúa,F. Álvarez García,A. Medina Villanueva,A. Concha Torre,J. Mayordomo Colunga,P. Martínez Camblor
Anales de Pediatría. 2013; 79(3): 136
[Pubmed]
3 Vein Thrombosis Associated with Umbilical Vascular Catheters with Color Doppler
Masoud Nemati,Manijeh Mostafa Gharehbagh,Abolhassan Shakeri,Reza Taei Nobari,Noushin Behravan,Mohamad Goldust
Journal of Biological Sciences. 2013; 13(8): 722
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Online since 7th April '04
Published by Medknow