Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 4 ( October, 2007 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of norepinephrine and dopamine in the management of septic shock using impedance cardiography

Arpan Chakraborty, Sharad K. Mathur, Rajiv Dhunna*

Keywords : Dopamine, impedance cardiography, norepinephrine

Citation Information : Chakraborty A, Mathur SK, Dhunna* R. Comparison of norepinephrine and dopamine in the management of septic shock using impedance cardiography. Indian J Crit Care Med 2007; 11 (4):186-191.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.37713

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-07-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objective: Vasoconstrictors are one of the therapeutic modalities in the treatment of septic shock. In the present study, we have compared the effects of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock with pre-defined end-points and continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring using impedance cardiography. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Sixteen-bedded mixed intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching institution. Materials and Methods: The study included 50 consecutive patients presenting with septic shock and divided randomly into two groups with 25 patients in each group. Group I patients were treated with dopamine and those in Group II were treated with norepinephrine. They were optimized with fluid resuscitation upto CVP>10 cm of H 2 O, packed red cells transfusion upto hematocrit >30, oxygenation and ventilation upto PaO 2 >60 mmHg before the inotropes were started. The goal of therapy was to achieve and maintain for six hours, all of the following: (1) SBP >90 mm Hg, (2) SVRI >1100 dynes.s/cm 5 m 2, (3) Cardiac Index >4.0L/min/m 2, (4) IDO 2 >550 ml/min/m 2 and (5) IVO 2 >150 ml/min/m 2. Measurements: The demographic data, baseline parameters and post-treatment parameters were statistically analyzed by using t-test. Results: The post-treatment parameters were statistically significant showing the superiority of norepinephrine over dopamine in optimization of hemodynamics and patient survival. Significant improvement in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac index, SVRI, IVO 2 and urine output were found in norepinephrine group than the dopamine group. Dopamine showed a response in 10 out of 25 patients up to a maximum dose of 25 mcg/kg/min while with norepinephrine, 19 patients responded up to a maximum dose of 2.5 mcg/kg/min The hemodynamic parameters were preserved in norepinephrine group with better preservation of organ perfusion and oxygen utilization with maintenance of splanchnic and renal blood flow as evidenced by significant increase in O2 uptake and urine flow. Conclusion: Norepinephrine was more useful in reversing the hemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities of septic shock compared to dopamine at the doses tested.


PDF Share
  1. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring for combat casualties. Mil Med 2006;171:813-20.
  2. Invasive and noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring of acutely ill sepsis and septic shock patients in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 2000;7:169-75.
  3. Outcome prediction of emergency patients by noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. Chest 2001;120:528-37.
  4. Mathematical program for outcome prediction and therapeutic support for trauma beginning within 1 hr of admission: A preliminary report. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1647-8.
  5. Noninvasive estimation of CO and circulatory dynamics in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Crit Care 1995;1:211-8.
  6. Multi centered trial of a new thoracic electric bioimpedence devise for CO estimation. Crit Care Med 1994;22:190-7.
  7. Gastric Intramucosal pH a better ptredictor of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome and death than oxygen-derived variables in patients with sepsis. Chest 1993;104:225-9.
  8. Effect of norepinephrine on the outcome of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2000;28:2758-65.
  9. Effects of various sympathicomimetic drugs on renal hemodynamics in normotensive and hypotensive dogs. Am J Physiol 1960;198:1279-83.
  10. Norepinephrine alone versus norepinephrine plus low dose dopamine: Enhanced renal blood flow with combination pressure therapy. Crit Care Med 1985;13:492-6.
  11. The use of oxygen consumption and delivery as endpoints for resuscitation in critically ill patients. J Trauma 1996;41:32-40
  12. Oxygen transport measurements to evaluate tissue perfusion and titrate therapy. Crit Care Med 1991;19:672-88.
  13. Is it time to reposition vasopressors and inotropes in sepsis? Crit Care Med 1996;24:525-37.
  14. Cardiac function and chronotropic sensitivity to beta adrenergic stimulation is sepsis. Am J Physiol 1986;251:H405-12.
  15. Effect of dopamine vs norepinephrine on hemodynamics in septic shock: Emphasis on right ventricular performance. Chest 1989;95:1282-8.
  16. Sequential cardiorespiratory patterns associated with outcome in septic shock. Chest 1984;85:75-80.
  17. Comparative evaluation of sympathomimetic amines in clinical shock. Circulation 1966;34:260-71.
  18. Blood flow and adrenergic drugs in septic shock. In: Vincent JL, editor. Update in intensive care and emergency medicine. Berlin: Springer -Verlag; 1991. p. 144-62.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.