Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( September, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A computer-assisted recording, diagnosis and management of the medically ill system for use in the intensive care unit: A preliminary report

Kishore Pichamuthu, Binila Chacko, John Victor Peter, John Victor Peter, Aparajita Rao, K. Subbalakshmi, Kavitha Elizabeth George, Sawan Kumar Agarwal, S. Margret Anouncia, Ebenezer Sunderraj, Arul Siromoney

Keywords : Alerts, alpha testing, checklist, decision support system, computer-assisted recording, diagnosis and management of the medically-ill

Citation Information : Pichamuthu K, Chacko B, Peter JV, Peter JV, Rao A, Subbalakshmi K, George KE, Agarwal SK, Anouncia SM, Sunderraj E, Siromoney A. A computer-assisted recording, diagnosis and management of the medically ill system for use in the intensive care unit: A preliminary report. Indian J Crit Care Med 2009; 13 (3):136-142.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.58538

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background: Computerized medical information systems have been popularized over the last two decades to improve quality and safety, and for decreasing medical errors. Aim: To develop a clinician-friendly computer-based support system in the intensive care unit (ICU) that incorporates recording, reminders, alerts, checklists and diagnostic differentials for common conditions encountered in critical care. Materials and Methods: This project was carried out at the Medical ICU CMC Hospital, Vellore, in collaboration with the Computer Science Department, VIT University. The first phase was to design and develop monitoring and medication sheets. Terminologies such as checklists (intervention list that pops up at defined times for all patients), reminders (intervention unique to each patient) and alerts (time-based, value-based, trend-based) were defined. The diagnostic and intervention bundles were characterized in the second phase. The accuracy and reliability of the software to generate alerts, reminders and diagnoses was tested in the third phase. The fourth phase will be to integrate this with the hospital information system and the bedside monitors. Results: Alpha testing was performed using six scenarios written by intensivists. The software generated real-time alerts and reminders and provided diagnostic differentials relevant to critical care. Predefined interventions for each diagnostic possibility appeared as pop-ups. Problems identified during alpha testing were rectified prior to beta testing. Conclusions: The use of a computer-assisted monitoring, recording and diagnostic system appears promising. It is envisaged that further software refinements following beta testing would facilitate the improvement of quality and safety in the critical care environment.


PDF Share
  1. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:143-7.
  2. Clinical information systems and the electronic medical record in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002;8:616-24.
  3. An evaluation of patient data management systems in Dutch intensive care. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:167-71.
  4. The use of intensive care information systems alters outcome prediction. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:953-8.
  5. Patient data management systems in intensive care-the situation in Europe. Intensive Care Med 1995;21:703-15.
  6. Computer assisted data analysis in intensive care: The ICDEV project- development of a scientific database system for intensive care (Intensive Care Data Evaluation Project). Int J Clin Monit Comput 1995;12:147-59.
  7. Quality benefits of an intensive care clinical information system. Crit Care Med 2003;31:120-5.
  8. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 1998;280:1339-46.
  9. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: A systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765.
  10. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
  11. The checklist: If something so simple can transform intensive care, what else can it do? New Yorker 2007;10:86-101.
  12. Checklists: Simple but overlooked solution to airway complexities. The emergency airway. Emergency Med News 2008;30:16.
  13. Changes in intensive care unit nurse task activity after installation of a third-generation intensive care unit information system. Crit Care Med 2003;31:2488-94.
  14. Hybrid approach using case-based reasoning and rule-based reasoning for domain independent clinical decision support in ICU. Expert Systems with Applications. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.054.
  15. What makes a good clinical decision support system? BMJ 2005;330:740-1.
  16. Informatique mιdicale (medical informatics). RACP news 2008;28:17-20.
  17. Developing high-quality educational software. J Dent Educ 2003;67:1209-20.
  18. Design and development of a web-based application for diabetes patient data management. Inform Prim Care 2005;13:35-41.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.