Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Maternal outcomes in critically ill obstetrics patients: A unique challenge

Rakesh Bhadade, Rosemarie de\' de′ Souza, Anirudha More

Keywords : Critical illness, hepatitis, infection, pregnancy-induced hypertension

Citation Information : Bhadade R, de′ Souza RD, More A. Maternal outcomes in critically ill obstetrics patients: A unique challenge. Indian J Crit Care Med 2012; 16 (1):8-16.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.94416

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 00-01-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background: A pregnant woman is usually young and in good health until she suffers from some acute injury. Her prognosis will hopefully be better if she receives timely intensive care. Materials and Methods: The aims of this study were to study the indications of medical intensive care unit (MICU) transfers for critically ill pregnant and postpartum females, biochemical and hematological profile, organ failure, ICU interventions, outcome of mother/fetus, APACHE II score and its correlation with mortality. Study Design and Setting: It is a prospective observational study, carried out in the MICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital over a period of 18 months. One hundred and twenty-two pregnant and postpartum females (up to 42 days after delivery) were studied. Results and Conclusion: Maternal age >30 years was associated with high mortality (68.2%). Majority of the females were admitted in the third trimester (50 patients) and postpartum period (41 patients), and mortality was highest in the postpartum period (39%). Increasing parity and gravida was associated with significantly high mortality (59.5%). Acute viral hepatitis E (45 patients) was most common indication for MICU transfer, followed by malaria and pregnancy-induced hypertension. The mortality rate was 30.3%. The most common cause of death was acute viral hepatitis E (24 patients), with hepatic failure (53 patients) being the most common organ failure. Majority of the females (88 patients) were ANC registered. Low Glasgow coma score and high APACHE II score on admission were associated with significantly high mortality (85.2%). Prompt treatment with oseltamivir in H1N1 infection was associated with good maternal and fetal outcomes.


PDF Share
  1. Critically ill obstetrical patients: outcome and predictability. Crit Care Med 1994;22:1412-4.
  2. Vol. 2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992. p. 98-9. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD-10_2 nd _ed_volume2.pdf. [Last accessed on 2011 June 22]
  3. Available from: http://www.who.ch/whday/1998/index.html.[Last accessed on 2011 June 22]th
  4. Available from: http://www.who.int/whosis/mme_2005.pdf. [Last accessed on 2011 June 22]
  5. ” Women′s International Network News 24, no. 3 (1998):15-18. Available from: http://www.deathreference.com/Me-Nu/Mortality-Childbirth.html.
  6. Maternal intensive care and near miss mortality in obstetrics. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998;105:981-4.
  7. Obstetrics complications. In: Leveno KJ, Steven BL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, editors. Williams Obstetrics. 23 rd ed. New-York: McGraw Hill; 2011. p. 706-841.
  8. Treatment in an obstetric intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1-4.
  9. Critical care in obstetrics. Bombay Hosp J 1999;19:127-49.
  10. Maternal mortality in the United States: report from the Maternal Mortality Collaborative. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:91-7.
  11. A study on maternal mortality in Silchar medical college and hospital. J Obstet Gynecol India 2001;51:67-70.
  12. Maternal mortality at Karamsad-The only rural medical college in Gujarat. J Obstet Gynecol India 2001;51:63-6.
  13. Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of definition for a near- miss. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998;105:985-90.
  14. Prognostic factors in obstetric patients admitted to an Indian intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1294-9.
  15. Maternal intensive care and near-miss mortality in obstetrics. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998;105:981-4.
  16. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill obstetric patients. Chest 1996;110;1299-304.
  17. Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:263-6.
  18. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, organ failure, and outcome in critically ill obstetric patients treated in an ICU. Chest 2001;120:1271-7.
  19. The parkland memorial hospital protocol for treatment of Eclampsia. Evaluation of 245 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:951-63.
  20. Critical care in obstetrical patients. An eight year review. Chin Med J (Engl) 1997;110:936-41.
  21. Critical care management of the obstetric patients. Can J Anaesth 1997;44:325-9.
  22. Critically ill obstetric patients in Australia: a retrospective audit of 8 years′ experience in a tertiary intensive care unit. Crit Care Resusc 2008;10:124.
  23. Eclampsia. VI. Maternal-perinatal outcome in 254 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1049-54; discussion 1054-5.
  24. Intensive care unit morbidity and mortality from eclampsia: an evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score and the Glasgow coma scale score. Crit Care Med 2000:28:120-4.
  25. ′Near- miss′ obstetric enquiry. J Obstet Gynecol 1997;17:26-9.
  26. Severe 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women in California. N Engl J Med 2010;362:27-35.
  27. Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus among Gravid Admissions. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:868-73.
  28. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/recommendations.htm. [Last accessed on 2009]
  29. Critically ill obstetric patients in an American and an Indian public hospital: comparison of case-mix, organ dysfunction, intensive care requirements, and outcomes. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:1087-94.
  30. Dialysis requiring pregnancy related acute kidney injury- A single center experience. Kuwait Med J 2010;42:124-8.
  31. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818-29.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.