Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Is liquid heparin comparable to dry balanced heparin for blood gas sampling in intensive care unit?

Pallavi Goyal, Viswas Chhapola, Sandeep Kumar

Keywords : Blood gas analysis, dry balanced heparin, liquid heparin, pre-analytic error

Citation Information : Goyal P, Chhapola V, Kumar S. Is liquid heparin comparable to dry balanced heparin for blood gas sampling in intensive care unit?. Indian J Crit Care Med 2014; 18 (1):14-20.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.125428

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-01-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Blood gas (BG) analysis is required for management of critically ill patients in emergency and intensive care units. BG parameters can be affected by the type of heparin formulations used-liquid heparin (LH) or dry balanced heparin (DBH). This study was conducted to determine whether blood gas, electrolyte, and metabolite estimations performed by using DBH and LH are comparable. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted at pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Paired venous samples were collected from 35 consecutive children in commercially prepared DBH syringes and custom-prepared LH syringes. Samples were immediately analyzed by blood gas analyzer and compared for pH, pCO 2, pO 2, HCO 3 -, Na +, K +, Cl -, and lactate. Paired comparisons were done and agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman difference plots. The 95% limits of absolute agreement (LOA) were compared with the specifications for total allowable error (TEa). Results: The P values were significant for all measured parameters, with the exception of pCO 2 and K +. Bland-Altman difference plots showed wide LOA for pCO 2, pO 2, HCO3 -, Na +, K +, and Cl - when compared against TEa. For pCO 2, HCO3 -, Na +, K +, and Cl -, 40%, 23%, 77%, 34%, and 54% of samples were outside the TEa limits, respectively, with LH. Conclusion: Our study showed that there is poor agreement between LH and DBH for the BG parameters pCO2, pO2, HCO3 -, K +, Na +, and Cl - and, thus, are not comparable. But for pH and lactate, LH and DBH can be used interchangeably.


PDF Share
  1. Higgins C. The use of heparin in preparing samples for blood-gas analysis. MLO Med Lab Obs 2007;39:16-8, 20.
  2. Bowen RA, Hortin GL, Csako G, Otanez OH, Remaley AT. Impact of blood collection devices on clinical chemistry assays. Clin Biochem 2010;43:4-25.
  3. Ordog GJ, Wasserberger J, Balasubramaniam S. Effect of heparin on arterial blood gases. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:233-8.
  4. Hutchison AS, Ralston SH, Dryburgh FJ, Small M, Fogelman I. Too much heparin: Possible source of error in blood gas analysis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983;287:1131-2.
  5. Karendal B. Effect of heparin or saline dilution of blood on PCO2 and pH. Ups J Med Sci 1975;80:175-7.
  6. Van BM, Scharnhorst V. Electrolyte-balanced heparin in blood gas syringes can introduce a significant bias in the measurement of charged electrolytes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:249-52.
  7. Whitley E, Jonathan B. Statistics review 4: Sample size calculations. Crit Care 2002;6:335-41.
  8. NCCLS. Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Second Edition. NCCLS document EP9-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-472-4).
  9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:136-60.
  10. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: Pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:491-500.
  11. Toffaletti J. Use of novel preparations of heparin to eliminate interference in ionised calcium measurements: Have all the problems been solved? Clin Chem 1994;40:508-9.
  12. Guder WG. World Health Organization. Use of anticoagulants in diagnostic laboratory investigations, WHO/DIL/LAB/99.1 Rev 2, 2002; 6.
  13. Gruber M, Spaeth R, Bechmann V. Heparin release is insufficient in syringes with platelets as heparin source. Clin Chim Acta 2008;395:187.
  14. Orazio PD. Effects of blood clots on measurements of pH and blood gases in critical care analyzers. Point of Care 2011;10:186-8.
  15. Dake MD, Peters J, Teague R. The effect of heparin dilution on arterial blood gas analysis. West J Med 1984;140:792-3.
  16. Simmons DH. The effect of heparin dilution on arterial blood gas analysis. West J Med 1984;141:525-6.
  17. Gayed A, Marino E. Dolnski E. Comparison of the effects of dry and liquid heparin on neonatal arterial blood gases. Am J Perinatol 1992;9:159-81.
  18. Chhapola V, Kanwal SK, Sharma R, Kumar V. A comparative study on reliability of point of care sodium and potassium estimation in a pediatric intensive care unit. Indian J Pediatr 2013;80:731-5.
  19. Shin CS, Chang CH, Kim JH. Liquid heparin anticoagulant produces more negative bias in the determination of ionized magnesium than ionized calcium. Yonsei Med J 2006;47:191-5.
  20. Chantler J, Cox DJ. Self-prepared heparinized syringes for measuring ionized magnesium in critical care patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:810-2.
  21. Calatayud O, Tenias JM. Effects of time, temperature and blood cell counts on levels of lactate in heparinized whole blood gas samples. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2003;63:311-4.
  22. Crockett AJ, McIntyre E, Ruffin R, Alpers JH. Evaluation of lyophilized heparin syringes for the collection of arterial blood for acid base analysis. Anaesth Intensive Care 1981;9:40-2.
  23. Wiwanitkit V. Glass syringes are better than plastic for preserving arterial blood gas for oxygen partial pressure determination: An explanation based on nanomaterial composition. Int J Nanomed 2006;1:223-4.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.