Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 8 ( August, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Funding sources for continuing medical education: An observational study

Babu K. Abraham, Arun S. Ponnish

Keywords : Accreditation, continuing medical education, continuing medical education credit, funding, sponsorship

Citation Information : Abraham BK, Ponnish AS. Funding sources for continuing medical education: An observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2014; 18 (8):513-517.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.138152

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aims: Medical accreditation bodies and licensing authorities are increasingly mandating continuing medical education (CME) credits for maintenance of licensure of healthcare providers. However, the costs involved in participating in these CME activities are often substantial and may be a major deterrent in obtaining these mandatory credits. It is assumed that healthcare providers often obtain sponsorship from their institutions or third party payers (i.e. pharmaceutical-industry) to attend these educational activities. Data currently does not exist exploring the funding sources for CME activities in India. In this study, we examine the relative proportion of CME activities sponsored by self, institution and the pharmaceutical-industry. We also wanted to explore the characteristics of courses that have a high proportion of self-sponsorship. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective audit of the data during the year 2009 conducted at an autonomous clinical training academy. The details of the sponsor of each CME activity were collected from an existing database. Participants were subsequently categorized as sponsored by self, sponsored by institution or sponsored by pharmaceutical-industry. Results: In the year 2009, a total of 2235 participants attended 40 different CME activities at the training academy. Of the total participants, 881 (39.4%) were sponsored by self, 898 (40.2%) were sponsored by institution and 456 (20.3%) by pharmaceutical-industry. About 47.8% participants attended courses that carried an international accreditation. For the courses that offer international accreditation, 63.3% were sponsored by self, 34.9% were sponsored by institution and 1.6% were sponsored by pharmaceutical-industry. There were 126 participants (5.6%) who returned to the academy for another CME activity during the study period. Self-sponsored (SS) candidates were more likely to sponsor themselves again for subsequent CME activity compared with the other two groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In our study, majority of healthcare professionals attending CME activities were either self or institution sponsored. There was a greater inclination for self-sponsoring for activities with international accreditation. SS candidates were more likely to sponsor themselves again for subsequent CME activities.


PDF Share
  1. Myers JL, Greenson JK. Life-long learning and self-assessment. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:851-3.
  2. Miller SH, Thompson JN, Mazmanian PE, Aparicio A, Davis DA, Spivey BE, et al. Continuing medical education, professional development, and requirements for medical licensure: A white paper of the Conjoint Committee on Continuing Medical Education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:95-8.
  3. Johnson DA, Austin DL, Thompson JN. Role of state medical boards in continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2005;25:183-9.
  4. Rodgers DJ. AOA continuing medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2010;110:168-82.
  5. van der Velden T, Van HN, Quoc HN, Van HN, Baron RB. Continuing medical education in Vietnam: New legislation and new roles for medical schools. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010;30:144-8.
  6. Gujarat Medical Council. Continuing Medical Education in Modern Medicine in the State of Gujarat. 2012. Available from: http://www.gmcgujarat.org/REVISED_CME_GUIDELINES.doc. [Last accessed on 2013 Aug 25].
  7. Center for CME accreditation, The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University. 2010. Available from: http: //www. web. tnmgrmu. ac.in/CME/accreditationcentre.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Aug 25].
  8. Express News Service. To renew registration, doctors will have to earn 12 credit pts by March. Indian Express, Pune. Available from: http:// www.indianexpress.com/news/to-renew-registration-doctors-will-have-to- earn-12-credit-pts-by-march/897975/2. [Last accessed on 2012 Jan 10].
  9. Tamil Nadu docs will have to renew licences every five years. Available from: http:// www. articles. timesofindia. indiatimes. com /2012-08-31/ chennai /33520272_1_medical-council-k-prakasam-doctors. [Last accessed on 2013 Aug 25].
  10. Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) (Amendment) Regulations, 2009-Part-I. Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/ Rulesand Regulations/ Code of Medical Ethics Regulations 2002. aspx. [Last accessed on 2013 Aug 25].
  11. Tabas JA, Boscardin C, Jacobsen DM, Steinman MA, Volberding PA, Baron RB. Clinician attitudes about commercial support of continuing medical education: Results of a detailed survey. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:840-6.
  12. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education annual report data, 2006. http://www. accme. org /dir_docs /doc_upload d/ f51ed7d8-e3b4-479a-a9d8-57b6efedc27a_uploaddocument.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Aug 25].
  13. Mueller PS, Hook CC, Litin SC. Physician preferences and attitudes regarding industry support of CME programs. Am J Med 2007;120:281-5.
  14. Rutledge P, Crookes D, McKinstry B, Maxwell SR. Do doctors rely on pharmaceutical industry funding to attend conferences and do they perceive that this creates a bias in their drug selection? Results from a questionnaire survey. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2003;12:663-7.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.