Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 21 , ISSUE 4 ( 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Gender-based assessment of survival in trauma-hemorrhagic shock: A retrospective analysis of Indian population

Pankaj Verma, Sanjeev Bhoi, Upendra Baitha, Tej Prakash Sinha, Prakash Ranjan Mishra

Keywords : road traffic crash, systolic blood pressure, trauma-hemorrhagic shock,Mode of injury

Citation Information : Verma P, Bhoi S, Baitha U, Sinha TP, Mishra PR. Gender-based assessment of survival in trauma-hemorrhagic shock: A retrospective analysis of Indian population. Indian J Crit Care Med 2017; 21 (4):218-223.

DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_304_16

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 00-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Trauma-hemorrhagic shock (THS) is a leading cause of death. Female rats and women experience better outcomes in terms of survival after major trauma as compared to males. There are limited data in Indian population. Authors studied the gender-based outcome of patients with Class IV hemorrhagic shock due to blunt trauma and the distribution of factors among males and females which are known to affect outcome. Materials and Methods: It was a retrospective study with data of trauma victims between January 2008 and July 2013. Road traffic crash (RTC), fall, or assault of all ages with Class IV hemorrhagic shock on arrival was included in the study, and data were collected on demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. Drowning, burns, penetrating injuries, and septic, neurogenic, and cardiogenic shock were excluded from the study. Results: Seven hundred and eighty-one patients were analyzed under three groups: (i) overall group including all patients (n = 781), (ii) male group (n = 609), and (iii) female group (n = 172). After adjusting all variables, mortality was significantly lower in females as compared to males following THS (P < 0.05). Age, blood pressure, pulse, male gender, and fall and RTC as mode of injury (MOI) were independent predictors of mortality (P < 0.05) in overall group. Among males, age, pulse, and RTC as a MOI were significant (P < 0.05), while in females, only systolic blood pressure (SBP) was independent predictor of mortality. Conclusion: Females had better survival as compared to males following THS. SBP was an independent predictor of mortality in females with THS.


PDF Share
  1. Elaju M, Ongom PA, Kijjambu SC, Wangoda R. Short term outcome of haemorrhagic shock in trauma at Mulago Hospital, an Urban Tertiary Hospital in Sub Saharan Africa. Trop Med Surg 2013;1:6.
  2. Frink M, Pape HC, van Griensven M, Krettek C, Chaudry IH, Hildebrand F. Influence of sex and age on mods and cytokines after multiple injuries. Shock 2007;27:151-6.
  3. Yu HP, Chaudry IH. The role of estrogen and receptor agonists in maintaining organ function after trauma-hemorrhage. Shock 2009;31:227-37.
  4. Deitch EA, Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Monaghan SF, Bongu A, Machiedo GW. Hormonally active women tolerate shock-trauma better than do men: A prospective study of over 4000 trauma patients. Ann Surg 2007;246:447-53.
  5. Angele MK, Wichman M, Eisenmenger S. Immunologic effects of sex hormones following hemorrhagic shock: Potential therapeutic applications: A Review. X X vs X Y 2003;1:39-45.
  6. Kerby JD, McGwin G Jr., George RL, Cross JA, Chaudry IH, Rue LW 3rd. Sex differences in mortality after burn injury: Results of analysis of the National Burn Repository of the American Burn Association. J Burn Care Res 2006;27:452-6.
  7. Trentzsch H, Nienaber U, Behnke M, Lefering R, Piltz S. Female sex protects from organ failure and sepsis after major trauma haemorrhage. Injury 2014;45 Suppl 3:S20-8.
  8. Sperry JL, Nathens AB, Frankel HL, Vanek SL, Moore EE, Maier RV, et al. Characterization of the gender dimorphism after injury and hemorrhagic shock: Are hormonal differences responsible? Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury Investigators. Crit Care Med 2008;36:1838-45.
  9. George RL, McGwin G Jr., Windham ST, Melton SM, Metzger J, Chaudry IH, et al. Age-related gender differential in outcome after blunt or penetrating trauma. Shock 2003;19:28-32.
  10. Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: An overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma 2006;60 6 Suppl: S3-11.
  11. Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Dass RM, Mbelenge N, Ngayomela IH, Chandika AB, et al. Injury characteristics and outcome of road traffic crash victims at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. J Trauma Manag Outcomes 2012;6:1.
  12. Kobusingye OC, Lett RR. Hospital-based trauma registries in Uganda. J Trauma 2000;48:498-502.
  13. Heckbert SR, Vedder NB, Hoffman W, Winn RK, Hudson LD, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Outcome after hemorrhagic shock in trauma patients. J Trauma 1998;45:545-9.
  14. Haider AH, Crompton JG, Chang DC, Efron DT, Haut ER, Handly N, et al. Evidence of hormonal basis for improved survival among females with trauma-associated shock: An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma 2010;69:537-40.
  15. Lehmann R, Beekley A, Casey L, Salim A, Martin M. The impact of advanced age on trauma triage decisions and outcomes: A statewide analysis. Am J Surg 2009;197:571-4.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.