Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 22 , ISSUE 9 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Survey on Perceived Impact of Religion, Culture, and Social Network Information on Surrogate Decision-making in a South Asian Developed Country

Shahla Siddiqui, Sukhanya Sureish, Audris Chia

Keywords : Culture, religion, social media information, surrogate decision making

Citation Information : Siddiqui S, Sureish S, Chia A. Survey on Perceived Impact of Religion, Culture, and Social Network Information on Surrogate Decision-making in a South Asian Developed Country. Indian J Crit Care Med 2018; 22 (9):656-659.

DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_383_17

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Relatives often have to assume responsibility for making end of life choices as surrogate decision-makers for patients with diminished or are lacking capacity. Our aim was to study the influence of religion, culture and social network information on surrogate decision making. Methods: This study was an exploratory, prospective, survey. Questions addressed the role of surrogates in decision making and the importance and influence of religion, culture and social media on such decisions. Results: 34 respondents filled out the anonymous survey. Surrogate decision making is a complex process and influenced by many factors. Conclusion: This survey points to a need for wider studies looking at the factors influencing people when making such important decisions and further social psychology interventions to evaluate whether such decisions can be made more consistent and patient centred.


PDF Share
  1. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361-7.
  2. White DB. Rethinking interventions to improve surrogate decision making in Intensive Care Units. Am J Crit Care 2011;20:252-7.
  3. Torke AM, Sachs GA, Helft PR, Montz K, Hui SL, Slaven JE, et al. Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:370-7.
  4. AMA Code of Medical Ethics. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 28].
  5. Shah RD, Rasinski KA, Alexander GC. The influence of surrogate decision makers on clinical decision making for critically ill adults. J Intensive Care Med 2015;30:278-85.
  6. Surrogate decision making: Families are much more than visitors. Available from: http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2014/03/surrogate-decision-making-families-visitors.html. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 28].
  7. Moore JA, Gallagher CM. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age? Am J Bioeth 2012;12:47-9.
  8. Fritsch J, Petronio S, Helft PR, Torke AM. Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: Ethical factors considered by family surrogates. J Clin Ethics 2013;24:125-34.
  9. Ho ZJ, Radha Krishna LK, Yee CP. Chinese familial tradition and western influence: A case study in Singapore on decision making at the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;40:932-7.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.