Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Quality of Life After Intensive Care Unit Discharge in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: Cost Effectiveness Analyis

Rajesh Kasimahanti, Ratender Kumar Singh, Arvind Kumar Baronia

Citation Information : Kasimahanti R, Singh RK, Baronia AK. Quality of Life After Intensive Care Unit Discharge in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: Cost Effectiveness Analyis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019; 23 (3):122-126.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23133

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Background: Improvements in intensive care in the last few decades have shifted the focus from mortality to quality of life of survivors as a more important outcome measure. Allocation of public resources towards intensive care is an important challenge for health care administrators. This challenge is made more arduous in resource limited countries like India. Thus, it is imperative to consider patient centred outcomes and resource utilisation to guide allocation of funds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of long-term survivors, and to perform cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. Methods: Data was retrieved from the records and included age, gender, admission diagnosis, length of ICU stay & mortality. Costing methodology used was top down approach. Quality of life was assessed by SF 36 scoring which was done with personal interview and telephonically. Cost effectiveness analysis was done on the basis of years of life added. Cost utility was done by QALY gained. Results: A total of 1232 adult patients were admitted in the period with 758 (61%) being successfully discharged from ICU with a mortality rate of 39%. Out of 758, we could contact 113 (15%) patients. 86 patients were alive at the time of contact who could fill the forms for quality of life. The patients discharged from ICU had scores almost similar to the general population. Lesser scores were noted in physical functioning and general health perceptions, though this difference was not statistically significant. The life years gained were significantly more in younger patients. The cost per life gained was more in patients aged more than 50 years compared to those who were younger. Conclusion: The quality of life after survival from ICU is as good as in the general population. The intensive care provided in our ICU is cost effective.

PDF Share
  1. Bickenbach J, Fries M, Rex S, Stitz C, Heussen N, Rossaint R et al. Outcome and mortality risk factors in long-term treated ICU patients: a retrospective analysis. Minerva anestesiologica 2011;77:427-38.
  2. Oeyen SG, Vandijck DM, Benoit DD, Annemans L, Decruyenaere JM. Quality of life after intensive care: a systematic review of the literature. Critical care medicine 2010;38:2386-400.
  3. Herridge M, Cox C. Linking ICU practice to long-term outcome: fostering a longitudinal vision for ICU-acquired morbidity. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2012;186:299-300.
  4. Laupland KB, Kirkpatrick AW, Kortbeek JB, Zuege DJ. Long-term mortality outcome associated with prolonged admission to the ICU. Chest 2006;129:954-9.
  5. Garcia Lizana F, Peres Bota D, De Cubber M, Vincent JL. Long-term outcome in ICU patients: what about quality of life? Intensive care medicine 2003;29:1286-93.
  6. Carden GP, Graham JW, McLennan S, Celi LA. Long-Term Outcome of Long Stay ICU and HDU Patients in a New Zealand Hospital. Critical care and shock 2008;11:26-34.
  7. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? Bmj 1993;306:1440-4.
  8. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Bmj 1993;306:1437-40.
  9. Lau RS, Johnson S, Kamalanabhan TJ. Healthy life expectancy in the context of population health and ageing in India. Asia-Pacific journal of public health 2012;24:195-207.
  10. Chattopadhyay A, Sinha KC. Spatial and gender scenario of literate life expectancy at birth in India. Asia-Pacific journal of public health 2010;22:477-91.
  11. Sassi F. Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. Health policy and planning 2006;21:402-8.
  12. Graf J, Wagner J, Graf C, Koch KC, Janssens U. Five-year survival, quality of life, and individual costs of 303 consecutive medical intensive care patients--a cost-utility analysis. Critical care medicine 2005;33:547-55.
  13. Jegers M, Edbrooke DL, Hibbert CL, Chalfin DB, Burchardi H. Definitions and methods of cost assessment: an intensivist's guide. ESICM section on health research and outcome working group on cost effectiveness. Intensive care medicine 2002;28:680-5.
  14. Lin M, Ward JE. Reliability of the MOS SF36 health status measure in Australian general practice. Australian family physician 1998;27 Suppl 2:S94-8.
  15. Malamardi SN, Kamath R, Tiwari R, Nair BV, Chandrasekaran V, Phadnis S. Occupational stress and health-related quality of life among public sector bank employees: A cross-sectional study in Mysore, Karnataka, India. Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2015;19:134-7.
  16. Kaarlola A, Pettila V, Kekki P. Quality of life six years after intensive care. Intensive care medicine 2003;29:1294-9.
  17. Flaatten H, Kvale R. Survival and quality of life 12 years after ICU. A comparison with the general Norwegian population. Intensive care medicine 2001;27:1005-11.
  18. Winters BD, Eberlein M, Leung J, Needham DM, Pronovost PJ, Sevransky JE. Long-term mortality and quality of life in sepsis: a systematic review. Critical care medicine 2010;38:1276-83.
  19. Pettila V, Kaarlola A, Makelainen A. Health-related quality of life of multiple organ dysfunction patients one year after intensive care. Intensive care medicine 2000;26:1473-9.
  20. Mazari FA, Shahin Y, Khan JA, Samuel N, Carradice D, Mccollum PT, Chetter IC et al. Comparison of Use of Short Form-36 Domain Scores and Patient Responses for Derivation of Preference-Based SF6D Index to Calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years in Patients with Intermittent Claudication. Annals of vascular surgery 2016;34:164-70.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.