Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey

Pattraporn Tajarernmuang, Peter Dodek, Daren K Heyland, Panida Chanayat, Juthamas Inchai, Chaicharn Pothirat, Chalerm Liwsrisakun, Chaiwat Bumroongkit, Athavuth Deesomchok, Theerakorn Theerakittikul, Atikun Limsukon

Keywords : Critical care, Family satisfaction, Intensive care unit, Quality care

Citation Information : Tajarernmuang P, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Chanayat P, Inchai J, Pothirat C, Liwsrisakun C, Bumroongkit C, Deesomchok A, Theerakittikul T, Limsukon A. Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24 (10):946-954.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23559

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-10-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose: To examine reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Family Satisfaction with Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire and use this survey in intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand. Materials and methods: The standard English FS-ICU questionnaire was translated into the Thai language using translation and culture adaptation guidelines. After reliability and validity testing, we consecutively surveyed the satisfaction of family members of ICU patients over 1 year. Adult family members of patients admitted to medical or surgical ICUs for 48 hours or more who had visited the patients at least once during the ICU stay were included. Results: In all, 315 (95%) of 332 surveys were returned from family members. Cronbach\'s α of the Thai FS-ICU 24 questionnaire was 0.95. Factor analysis demonstrated good construct validity. The mean (±SD) of total satisfaction score, overall ICU care subscale, and decision-making subscale were 81.5 ± 14.3, 81.0 ± 15.6, and 82.0 ± 14.0. Items with the lowest scores were the waiting room atmosphere and the frequency of doctors communicating with family members about the patient\'s condition. The mean total satisfaction score tended to be higher in family members of survivors than in family members of nonsurvivors (81.9 ± 13.8 vs 77.7 ± 16.2, p value = 0.059). The overall satisfaction scores between medial ICU vand surgical ICU were not significantly different. Conclusion: The Thai version of FS-ICU questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity in a Thai population and can be used to drive improvements in ICU care. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.in.th, TCR20160603002


PDF Share
  1. Maartje de Vos WG, Keesman ELS, Westert G, van der Voort PHJ. Quality measurement at intensive care units: Which indicators should we use? J Crit Care 2007;22(4):267–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.01.002.
  2. Nouira H, Ben Abdelaziz A, Kacem M, Ben Sik Ali H, Fekih Hassen M, Ben Abdelaziz A. Which indicators used to assess quality performance in intensive care units? A systematic review of medical literature. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2018;37(6):583–587. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.06.003.
  3. Schleyer AM, Curtis JR. Family satisfaction in the ICU: why should ICU clinicians care? Intensive Care Med 2013;39(6):1143–1145. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2939-3.
  4. McAdam JL, Arai S, Puntillo KA. Unrecognized contributions of families in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(6):1097–1101. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1066-z.
  5. Alvarez GF, Kirby AS. The perspective of families of the critically ill patient: their needs. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006;12(6):614–618. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328010c7ef.
  6. van den Broek JM, Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Zedlitz AM, Girbes AR, de Jonge E, Arbous MS. Questionnaires on family satisfaction in the adult ICU: a systematic review including psychometric properties. Crit Care Med 2015;43(8):1731–1744. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000980.
  7. Stricker KH, Kimberger O, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Mohr U, Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference? Intensive Care Med 2009;35(12):2051–2059. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1611-4.
  8. Schwarzkopf D, Behrend S, Skupin H, Westermann I, Riedemann NC, Pfeifer R, et al. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Intensive Care Med 2013;39(6):1071–1079. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2862-7.
  9. Heyland DK, Tranmer JE. Kingston general hospital ICURWG. Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results. J Crit Care 2001;16(4):142–149. DOI: 10.1053/jcrc.2001.30163.
  10. Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med 2007;35(1):271–279. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.
  11. Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ, Konopad E, Cook DJ, et al. Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med 2002;30(7):1413–1418. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00002.
  12. Available from: http://www.thecarenet.ca/family-satisfaction-survey-publications.
  13. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46(12):1417–1432. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.
  14. Lam S, So H, Fok S, Li S, Ng C, Lui W, et al. Intensive care unit family satisfaction survey. Hong Kong Med J 2015;21(5):435–443. DOI: 10.12809/hkmj144385.
  15. Tastan S, Iyigun E, Ayhan H, Kilickaya O, Yilmaz AA, Kurt E. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of family satisfaction in the intensive care unit. Int J Nurs Pract 2014;20(3):320–326. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12153.
  16. Frivold G, Slettebo A, Heyland DK, Dale B. Family members’ satisfaction with care and decision-making in intensive care units and post-stay follow-up needs-a cross-sectional survey study. Nurs Open 2018;5(1):6–14. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.97.
  17. Jongerden IP, Slooter AJ, Peelen LM, Wessels H, Ram CM, Kesecioglu J, et al. Effect of intensive care environment on family and patient satisfaction: a before-after study. Intensive Care Med 2013;39(9):1626–1634. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2966-0.
  18. Lilly CM, De Meo DL, Sonna LA, Haley KJ, Massaro AF, Wallace RF, et al. An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med 2000;109(6):469–475. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00524-6.
  19. Fawole OA, Dy SM, Wilson RF, Lau BD, Martinez KA, Apostol CC, et al. A systematic review of communication quality improvement interventions for patients with advanced and serious illness. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28(4):570–577. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2204-4.
  20. Hinkle LJ, Bosslet GT, Torke AM. Factors associated with family satisfaction with end-of-life care in the ICU: a systematic review. Chest 2015;147(1):82–93. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-1098.
  21. Rusinova K, Kukal J, Simek J, Cerny V, group Dsw. Limited family members/staff communication in intensive care units in the Czech and Slovak republics considerably increases anxiety in patients’ relatives–the DEPRESS study. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-21.
  22. McDonagh JR, Elliott TB, Engelberg RA, Treece PD, Shannon SE, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Family satisfaction with family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: increased proportion of family speech is associated with increased satisfaction. Crit Care Med 2004;32(7):1484–1488. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000127262.16690.65.
  23. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2007;356(5):469–478. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446.
  24. Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Gries CJ, Glavan B, Curtis JR. Spiritual care of families in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2007;35(4):1084–1090. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259382.36414.06.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.