Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Score in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Rudrarpan Chatterjee, Nitesh Parab, Basavaraj Sajjan, Vidya S Nagar

Keywords : Acute pancreatitis, Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, Atlanta classification, Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis, Computed tomography severity index

Citation Information : Chatterjee R, Parab N, Sajjan B, Nagar VS. Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Score in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24 (2):99-103.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23343

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aims of this study: Severe acute pancreatitis has been defined recently based on the persistence of organ failure at 48 hours of admission. The bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) score, a simplified scoring system to predict severity of acute pancreatitis, is proposed to be useful in early risk stratification of acute pancreatitis. Our aim was to prospectively compare BISAP score with the already established acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and modified computed tomography severity index (CTSI) scores in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. Materials and methods: A total of 87 consecutive cases presenting with the first attack of acute pancreatitis were included in the study. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and BISAP scores were calculated from the worst parameters in the first 24 hours, and modified CTSI was reported at 48 hours of admission. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and predictive accuracy of each score was calculated from the area under the curve. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each score. Results: A total of 20 patients (23%) had severe acute pancreatitis with a total of 11 mortalities (12.64%), 10 of them in the severe acute pancreatitis group. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, modified CTSI, and BISAP score all correlated well with each other. Modified CTSI and BISAP score also correlated with duration of hospital stay. Areas under the curve for APACHE II (≥8), modified CTSI (≥8), and BISAP score (≥2) were 0.826, 0.806, and 0.811, respectively, suggesting similar predictive accuracy. Conclusion: The BISAP score was similar to APACHE II and modified CTSI in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and NPV. It is much easier to calculate and a useful risk stratification tool. It should be used for early triage and referral to a high dependency unit.


PDF Share
  1. Bradley EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. summary of the international symposium on acute pancreatitis, Atlanta, ga, september 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg, Chic Ill 1960 1993;128(5):586–590. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420170122019.
  2. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62(1):102–111. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.
  3. Banks PA, Freeman ML. Practice parameters committee of the american college of gastroenterology. practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101(10):2379–2400. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x.
  4. Fagenholz PJ, Castillo CF, Harris NS, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA. Increasing United States hospital admissions for acute pancreatitis, 1988-2003. Ann Epidemiol 2007;17(7):491–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.02.002.
  5. Forsmark CE, Baillie J. AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA institute governing board. AGA institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2007;132(5): 2022–2044. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.065.
  6. Larvin M, McMahon MJ. APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet Lond Engl 1989;2(8656): 201–205. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90381-4.
  7. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E. Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 1994;193(2):297–306. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972730.
  8. Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, O'Connell M, Sanders MK, Slivka A, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105(2):435–441. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.622.
  9. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Tabak Y, Conwell DL, Banks PA. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut 2008;57(12):1698–1703. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.152702.
  10. Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, Repas K, Maurer R, Johannes RS, et al. A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104(4): 966–971. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.28.
  11. Cho JH, Kim TN, Chung HH, Kim KH. Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol WJG 2015;21(8):2387–2394. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2387.
  12. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 1995;23(10):1638–1652. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199510000-00007.
  13. Yeung YP, Lam BYK, Yip AWC. APACHE system is better than ranson system in the prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int HBPD INT 2006;5(2):294–299.
  14. Khanna AK, Meher S, Prakash S, et al. Comparison of ranson, glasgow, MOSS, SIRS, BISAP, APACHE II, CTSI scores, IL-6, CRP and procalcitonin in predicting severity, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. HPB Surg 2013; 367581. DOI: 10.1155/2013/367581.
  15. Green R, Milner J, Joy EJM, Agrawal S, Dangour AD. Dietary patterns in India: a systematic review. Br J Nutr 2016;116(1):142–148. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114516001598.
  16. Perez A, Whang EE, Brooks DC, Moore FD, Hughes MD, Sica GT, et al. Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis? Pancreas 2002;25(3):229–233. DOI: 10.1097/00006676-200210000-00003.
  17. Yadav J, Yadav SK, Kumar S, Baxla RG, Sinha DK, Bodra P, et al. Predicting morbidity and mortality in acute pancreatitis in an Indian population: a comparative study of the BISAP score, Ranson's score and CT severity index. Gastroenterol Rep 2016;4(3):216–220. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov009.
  18. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United states: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012;143(5):1179–1187. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002.
  19. Lankisch PG, Mahlke R, Blum T, Bruns A, Bruns D, Maisonneuve P, et al. Hemoconcentration: an early marker of severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis? a critical appraisal. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96(7): 2081–2085. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03966.x.
  20. Gan SI, Romagnuolo J. Admission hematocrit: a simple, useful and early predictor of severe pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2004;49(11-12):1946–1952. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-004-9598-8.
  21. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS. American college of gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108(9):1400–1415. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.