Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Dilatational Percutaneous vs Surgical TracheoStomy in IntEnsive Care UniT: A Practice Pattern Observational Multicenter Study (DISSECT)

Dhruva Choudhry, Zubair Mohamed, Nilanchal Chakrabortty, Kanchi VV Gupta

Keywords : Complications, Cost, Percutaneous dilatational, Surgical, Tracheostomy

Citation Information : Choudhry D, Mohamed Z, Chakrabortty N, Gupta KV. Dilatational Percutaneous vs Surgical TracheoStomy in IntEnsive Care UniT: A Practice Pattern Observational Multicenter Study (DISSECT). Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24 (7):514-526.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23441

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 05-09-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Tracheostomy is among the common procedures performed in the intensive care unit (ICU), with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) being the preferred technique. We sought to understand the current practice of tracheostomy in Indian ICUs. Materials and methods: A pan-India multicenter prospective observational study, endorsed and peer-reviewed by the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), on various aspects of tracheostomy performed in critically ill patients was conducted between September 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. The SPSS software was used for the statistical analysis. Cross tables were generated and the chi-square test was used for testing of association. The p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 67 ICUs that participated, 88.1% were from private sector hospitals. A total of 923 tracheostomies were performed during the study period; out of which, 666 were PDT and 257 were surgical tracheostomy (ST). Coagulopathic patients received more platelet transfusion [p = 0.037 with platelet count (PC) < 50 × 109, p = 0.021 with PC 50–100 × 109] and fresh frozen plasma transfusion in the ST group (p = 0.0001). The performance of PDT vs ST by day 7 of admission was 28.4% vs 21% (p = 0.023). The single dilator technique (60.4%) was the preferred technique for PDT followed by the Grigg\'s forceps and then the multiple dilator technique. Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) and ultrasonography (USG) were used in 29.3% and 16.8%, respectively, for guidance during tracheostomy. Most of the PDTs were performed by a trained intensivist (74.2%), whereas ST was mostly done by an ENT surgeon (56.8%). Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy resulted in less hemorrhagic (2.6% vs 7%, p = 0.002) and desaturation complications (2.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.001) as compared to ST. The duration of procedure was shorter in the PDT group (average shortening by 9.2 minutes) and the ventilator-free days (VFD) were higher in the PDT group. The cost was less in PDT by approximately Rs. 13,104. Conclusion: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, especially the single dilator technique, is preferred by clinicians in Indian ICUs. The incidence of minor complications like hemorrhagic episodes is lower with PDT. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy was found to be cheaper on cost per patient basis as compared to ST (with or without complications).


PDF Share
  1. Koksal GM, Sayilgan NC, Oz H. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2006;18(no. 5):903–910.
  2. Cooper RM. Use and safety of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care. Report of a postal survey of ICU practice. Anaesthesia 1998;53(12):1209–1212. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00579.x.
  3. Kumar P, Misra A, Anand R, Shastri BVR, Wadhawan S. Audit of the existing attitudes and practices of the medical intensivists regarding tracheostomy in the ICU's in India. Indian J Anaesth 2006;50(4):288–294.
  4. Divatia JV, Amin PR, Ramakrishnan N, Kapadia FN, Todi S, Sahu S, et al. Intensive care in India: the Indian intensive care case mix and practice patterns study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2016;20(4):216–225. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.180042.
  5. Kluge S, Meyer A, Kuhnelt P, Baumann HJ, Kreymann G. Percutaneous tracheostomy is safe in patients severe thrombocytopenia. Chest 2004;126(2):547–551. DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.2.547.
  6. Ben-Nun A, Altman E, Best LA. Extended indications for percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80(4):1276–1279. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.007.
  7. Beiderlinden M, Eikermann M, Lehmann N, Adamzik M, Peters J. Risk factors associated with bleeding during and after percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaesthesia 2007;62(4):342–346. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04979.x.
  8. Auzinger G, O'Callaghan GP, Bernal W, Sizer E, Wendon JA. Percutaneous tracheostomy in patients with severe liver disease and a high incidence of refractory coagulopathy: a prospective trial. Crit Care 2007;11(5):R110. DOI: 10.1186/cc6143.
  9. Deppe AC, Kuhn E, Scherner M, Slottosch I, Liakopoulos O. Coagulation disorders do not increase the risk for bleeding during percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;61(3):234–239. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1322608.
  10. Griffiths J, Barber VS, Morgan L, Young JD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation. BMJ 2005;330(7502):1243. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38467.485671.E0.
  11. Bouderka MA, Fakhir B, Bouaggad A, Hmamouchi B, Hamoudi D, Harti A. Early tracheostomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in severe head injury. J Trauma 2004;57(2):251–254. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000087646.68382.9a.
  12. Zirpe KG, Tambe DV, Deshmukh AM, Gurav SK. The impact of early tracheostomy in neurotrauma patients: a retrospective study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2017;21(1):6–10. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.198309.
  13. Trouillet JL, Luyt CE, Guiguet M, Ouattara A, Vaissier E, Makri R, et al. Early percutaneous tracheotomy versus prolonged intubation of mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2011;154(6):373–383. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00002.
  14. Terragni PP, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, Faggiano C, Berardino M, Pallavicini FB, et al. Early vs late tracheotomy for prevention of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;303(15):1483–1489. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.447.
  15. Blot F, Similowski T, Trouillet JL, Chardon P, Korach JM, Costa MA, et al. Early tracheotomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in unselected severely ill ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(10):1779–1787. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1195-4.
  16. Meng L, Wang C, Li J, Zhang J. Early vs late tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Respir J 2016;10(6):684–692. DOI: 10.1111/crj.12286.
  17. Nates JL, Cooper DJ, Myles PS, Scheinkestel CD, Tuxen DV. Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of two techniques. Crit Care Med 2000;28(11):3734–3739. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200011000-00034.
  18. Sanabria A. Which percutaneous tracheostomy method is better? a systematic review. Respir Care 2014;59(11):1660–1670. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03050.
  19. Kumar M, Trikha A, Chandralekha. percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator–a prospective randomized study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2012;16(2):87–92. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.99117.
  20. Kost KM. Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 2005;115(S107):1–30. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163744.89688.E8.
  21. Taha A, Omar AS. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. is bronchoscopy necessary? a randomized clinical trial. Trend Anaest Criti Care 2017;15:20–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2017.06.002.
  22. Hinerman R, Alvarez F, Keller CA. Outcome of bedside percutaneous tracheostomy with bronchoscopic guidance. Intensive Care Med 2000;26(12):1850–1856. DOI: 10.1007/s001340000718.
  23. Jackson LSM, Davis JW, Kaups KL, Sue LP, Wolfe MM, Bilello JF, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: to Bronch or not to Bronch—that is the question. J Trauma 2011;71(6):1553–1556. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823ba29e.
  24. Yavuz A, Yılmaz M, Göya C, Alimoglu E, Kabaalioglu A. Advantages of US in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: randomized controlled trial and review of the literature. Radiology 2014;273(3):927–936. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140088.
  25. Gobatto ALN, Besen BAMP, Tierno PFGMM, Mendes PV, Cadamuro F, Joelsons D. Ultrasound-guided percutaneousdilatational tracheostomyversus bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill patients (TRACHUS): a randomized noninferiority controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2016;42(3):342–351. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4218-6.
  26. Rudas M, Seppelt I, Herkes R, Hislop R, Rajbhandari D, Weisbrodt L. Traditional landmark versus ultrasound guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care patients: a randomised controlled trial. Crit Care 2014;18(5):514. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0.
  27. Seder DB, Lee K, Rahman C, Rossan-Raghunath N, Fernandez L, Rincon F, et al. Safety and feasibility of percutaneous tracheostomy performed by neurointensivists. Neurocrit Care 2009;10(3):264–268. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-008-9174-8.
  28. Khan AZ, Khan A, Naseem A. Percutaneous tracheostomy by physician intensivists. J Colle Phys Surg Pakistan 2018;28(3):222–225. DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.03.222.
  29. Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, Samuel J, Patel S, Appavu S, et al. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest 1996;110(2):480–485. DOI: 10.1378/chest.110.2.480.
  30. Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42(5):545–550. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05164.x.
  31. Johnson-Obaseki S, Veljkovic A, Javidnia H. Complication rates of open surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Laryngoscope 2016;126(11):2459–2467. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26019.
  32. Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti L, Corcione A, Laffey JG. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care 2015;19(1):291. DOI: 10.1186/s13054- 015-1013-7.
  33. Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Guenther U, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014;18(6):544. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7.
  34. Higgins KM, Punthakee X. Meta-analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 2007;117(3):447–454. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000251585.31778.c9.
  35. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Perren Cobb J, Boyle WA, Schmieg RE, Kolleff MH, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2001;29(5):926–930. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00002.
  36. Heikkinen M, Aarnio P, Hannukainen J. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy or conventional surgical tracheostomy? Crit Care Med 2000;28(5):1399–1402. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200005000-00023.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.