Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 24 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2020 ) > List of Articles


Voluntary Prone Position for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Unintubated Patients

Shoma V Rao, R Udhayachandar, Vasudha B Rao, Nithin A Raju, Juliana JJ Nesaraj, Subramani Kandasamy, Prasanna Samuel

Citation Information : Rao SV, Udhayachandar R, Rao VB, Raju NA, Nesaraj JJ, Kandasamy S, Samuel P. Voluntary Prone Position for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Unintubated Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24 (7):557-562.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23495

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-11-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Severe hypoxemic respiratory failure is frequently managed with invasive mechanical ventilation with or without prone position (PP). We describe 13 cases of nonhypercapnic acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) of varied etiology, who were treated successfully in PP without the need for intubation. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow oxygen via nasal cannula, supplementary oxygen with venturi face mask, or nasal cannula were used variedly in these patients. Mechanical ventilatory support is offered to patients with AHRF when other methods, such as NIV and oxygen via high-flow nasal cannula, fail. Invasive mechanical ventilation is fraught with complications which could be immediate, ranging from worsening of hypoxemia, worsening hemodynamics, loss of airway, and even death. Late complications could be ventilator-associated pneumonia, biotrauma, tracheal stenosis, etc. Prone position is known to improve oxygenation and outcome in adult respiratory distress syndrome. We postulated that positioning an unintubated patient with AHRF in PP will improve oxygenation and avoid the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and thereby its complications. Here, we describe a series of 13 patients with hypoxemic respiratory of varied etiology, who were successfully treated in the PP without endotracheal intubation. Two patients (15.4%) had mild, nine (69.2%) had moderate, and two (15.4%) had severe hypoxemia. Oxygenation as assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio in supine position was 154 ± 52, which improved to 328 ± 65 after PP. Alveolar to arterial (A-a) O2 gradient improved from a median of 170.5 mm Hg interquartile range (IQR) (127.8, 309.7) in supine position to 49.1 mm Hg IQR (45.0, 56.6) after PP. This improvement in oxygenation took a median of 46 hours, IQR (24, 109). Thus, voluntary PP maneuver improved oxygenation and avoided endotracheal intubation in a select group of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. This maneuver may be relevant in the ongoing novel coronavirus disease pandemic by potentially reducing endotracheal intubation and the need for ventilator and therefore better utilization of critical care services.

  1. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard J-C, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368(23):2159–2168. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103.
  2. Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NKJ, Hodgson CL, Wunsch H, Meade MO, et al. Prone position for acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14(Suppl 4):S280–S288. DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201704-343ot.
  3. Albert RK, Hubmayr RD. The prone position eliminates compression of the lungs by the heart. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161: 1660–1665. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9901037.
  4. Hedenstierna G. Effects of body position on ventilation/perfusion matching Gullo A, ed., Milano: Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E. Springer; 2005. DOI: 10.1007/88-470-0351-21.
  5. Berbenetz N, Wang Y, Brown J, Godfrey C, Ahmad M, Vital FM, et al. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4(4):CD005351. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005351.pub4.
  6. García-de-Acilu M, Patel BK, Roca O. Noninvasive approach for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 2019;25(1):54–62. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000570.
  7. Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS, Hall JB, Kress JP. Effect of noninvasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;315(22):2435–2441. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.6338.
  8. Patel BK, Wolfe KS, MacKenzie EL, Salem D, Esbrook CL, Pawlik AJ, et al. One-year outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of helmet versus facemask noninvasive ventilation. Crit Care Med 2018;46(7): 1078–1084. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003124.
  9. Ni Y-N, Luo J, Yu H, Liu D, Ni Z, Cheng J, et al. Can high-flow nasal cannula reduce the rate of endotracheal intubation in adult patients with acute respiratory failure compared with conventional oxygen therapy and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation? Chest 2017;151(4):764–775. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.004.
  10. Frat J-P, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, et al. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. New England Journal of Medicine 2015;372(23):2185–2196. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1503326.
  11. Zayed Y, Barbarawi M, Kheiri B, Haykal T, Chahine A, Rashdan L, et al. Initial noninvasive oxygenation strategies in subjects with De Novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Respir Care 2019;64(11): 1433–1444. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.
  12. Duan J, Han X, Bai L, Zhou L, Huang S. Assessment of heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, and respiratory rate to predict noninvasive ventilation failure in hypoxemic patients. Intensive Care Med 2017;43(2):192–199. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4601-3.
  13. Roca O, Messika J, Caralt B, García-de-Acilu M, Sztrymf B, Ricard JD, et al. Predicting success of high-flow nasal cannula in pneumonia patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: the utility of the ROX index. J Crit Care 2016;35:200–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016. 05.022.
  14. Roca O, Caralt B, Messika J, Samper M, Sztrymf B, Hernández G, et al. An index combining respiratory rate and oxygenation to predict outcome of nasal high-flow therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199(11):1368–1376. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0589OC.
  15. Conti G, Costa R, Antonelli M. Non-invasive ventilation in immunocompromised patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2011;77(3): 342–348.
  16. Huang HB, Xu B, Liu GY, Lin JD, Du B. Use of noninvasive ventilation in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2017;21(1):4. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1586-9.
  17. Wang Y, Ni Y, Sun J, Liang Z. Use of high-flow nasal cannula for immunocompromise and acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Emerg Med 2020(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.01.016.Article in press.
  18. Cortegiani A, Crimi C, Sanfilippo F, Noto A, Di Falco D, Grasselli G, et al., High flow nasal therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care 2019;50:250–256. ISSN 0883-9441 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018. 12.015.
  19. Hernández G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, González P, Canabal A, et al. Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs noninvasive ventilation on reintubation and postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;316(15):1565–1574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.
  20. Glossop AJ, Shepherd N, Bryden DC, Mills GH. Non-invasive ventilation for weaning, avoiding reintubation after extubation and in the postoperative period: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2012;109(3):305–314. ISSN 0007-0912 10.1093/bja/aes270.
  21. Lin C, Yu H, Fan H, Li Z. The efficacy of noninvasive ventilation in managing postextubation respiratory failure: a meta-analysis. Heart Lung 2014;43(2):99–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.01.002.
  22. Duan J, Chen L, Liang G, Shu W, Li L, Wang K, et al. Noninvasive ventilation failure in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: the role of sepsis and septic shock. Therap Adv Respirat Dis 2019;13:175346661988812. DOI: 10.1177/1753466619888124.
  23. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Madotto F, Fan E, Brochard L, et al. Noninvasive ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Insights from the LUNG SAFE study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195(1):67–77. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201606-1306OC.
  24. Frat JP, Ragot S, Coudroy R, Constantin JM, Girault C, Prat G, et al. REVA network. Predictors of intubation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated with a noninvasive oxygenation strategy. Crit Care Med 2018;46(2):208–215. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002818.
  25. Valter C, Christensen AM, Tollund C, Schønemann NK. Response to the prone position in spontaneously breathing patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47(4):416–418. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00088.x.
  26. Ding L, Wang L, Ma W, He H. Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2020;24(1):28. DOI:
  27. Pérez-Nieto OR, Guerrero-Gutiérrez MA, Deloya-Tomas E, Ñamendys-Silva SA. Prone positioning combined with high-flow nasal cannula in severe noninfectious ARDS. Crit Care 2020;24(1):114. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2821-y.
  28. Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in the emergency department: a single ED's experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Emerg Med 2020(5):Accepted Author Manuscript 10.1111/acem.13994.
  29. Prone Positioning During High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: a Pilot Physiological Trial Identifier: NCT03095300.
  30. Scala R, Pisani L. Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: which recipe for success? Eur Respir Rev 2018;27(149):180029. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0029-2018.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.