Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 25 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Association between SpO2/FiO2 Ratio and PaO2/FiO2 Ratio in Different Modes of Oxygen Supplementation

Sheetal Babu

Keywords : Arterial blood gas (ABG), Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Oxygen supplementation, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Pulse oximetry, SaO2/FiO2 ratio

Citation Information : Babu S. Association between SpO2/FiO2 Ratio and PaO2/FiO2 Ratio in Different Modes of Oxygen Supplementation. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25 (9):1001-1005.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23977

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 08-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Background: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is a major factor for increased mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We hypothesized that the noninvasive index SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio can be used as a surrogate to invasive index PaO2/FiO2 (PF) as SF ratio correlates with PF ratio in all modes of oxygen supplementation. Patients and methods: Patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), method of oxygen supplementation, and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) were noted from the ABG reports in the medical records. The corresponding SpO2 was noted from the nurse's chart. The calculated SF and PF ratios were recorded, and correlation between the same was noted in different methods of oxygen administration. Results: A total of 300-sample data were collected. Pearson's correlation was used to quantify the relationship between the variables. The study showed a positive correlation, r = 0.66 (p <0.001), between PF ratio and SF ratio. SF threshold values were 285 and 323 for corresponding PF values of 200 and 300 with a sensitivity and specificity in the range of 70 to 80%. In addition, SF and PF could also be used interchangeably irrespective of the mode of oxygen supplementation, as the median values of PF ratio (p = 0.06) and SF ratio (p = 0.88) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In patients with AHRF, the noninvasive SF ratio can be used as a surrogate to invasive index PF in all modes of oxygen supplementation.

  1. Scala R, Heunks L Highlights in acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir Rev 2018;27(147):180008. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0008-2018.
  2. Roussos C, Koutsoukou A. Respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2003;22(47 Suppl.):3S–14S. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00038503.
  3. Singh G, George G, Chandy TT, Sen N. Incidence and outcome of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome in the surgical intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2014;18:659–65. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.142175.
  4. Manthous CA. A practical approach to adult acute respiratory distress syndrome. Indian J Crit Care Med 2010;14(4):196–201. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.76084.
  5. Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L, Antonelli M, Anzueto A, Beale R, et al. The Berlin's definition of ARDS: an expandable rationale, justification and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med 2012;38(10):157382. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2682-1. PMID: 2292665.
  6. Chen W, Janz DR, Shaver CM, Bernard GR, Bastarache JA, Ware LB. Clinical characteristics and outcomes are similar in ARDS diagnosed by oxygen saturation/FiO2 ratio compared with PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Chest 2015;148(6):1477–1483 DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-0169. PMCID: PMC4665739. PMID: 26271028.
  7. Choi W, Shehu E, Lim SY, Koh SO, Jeon K, Na S, et al. Korean Study group on Respiratory Failure (KOSREF). Markers of poor outcome in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Journal of Critical Care 2014;29(5):797–802. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.017. PMID: 2499772418.
  8. Pisani L, Roozeman JP, Simonis FD, Giangregorio A, van der Hoeven SM, Schouten LR, et al. Risk stratification using SpO2/FiO2 and PEEP at initial ARDS diagnosis and after 24 h in patients with moderate or severe. ARDS Ann Intensive Care 2017;7:108. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-017-0327-9. PMCID: PMC5656507. PMID: 29071429.
  9. Coudroy R, Jean-Pierre F, Florence B, Damien C, René R, Thille AW. Early identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the absence of positive pressure ventilation: implications for revision of the berlin criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2018;46(4):540–546. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.00000000000029.
  10. Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM 2000;342(18):1301–1308. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. PMID: 10793162.
  11. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Ragon CP, Perrin G, Loundou A, et al; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM 2010;363(12):1107–1116. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372. PMID: 20843245.
  12. Thille AW, Contou D, Fragnoli C, Córdoba-Izquierdo A, Boissier F, Brun-Buisson C. Non-invasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: intubation rate and risk factors. Crit Care 2013;17(6):R269. DOI: 10.1186/cc13103. PMID: 24215648; PMCID: PMC4057073.
  13. Schwabbauer N, Berg B, Blumenstock G, Haap M, Hetzel J, Riessen R, et al. Nasal high–flow oxygen therapy in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure: effect on functional and subjective respiratory parameters compared to conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). BMC Anesthesiol 2014;14:66. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-66.
  14. Dhruva C, Rakesh S, Shirish P, Prashant N, Jatin S, Nagarajan R, et al. Guidelines for noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure October 2013. Indian J Crit Care Med 17(5):42–70. DOI: 10.5005/ijccm-17-5-42.
  15. Ohshimo S. Oxygen administration for patients with ARDS. Intensive Care 2021;9:17. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-021-00532-0.
  16. Rittayamai N, Brochard L. Recent advances in mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir Rev 2015;24(135):132–140. DOI: 10.1183/09059180.0001241.
  17. Bilan N, Dastranji A, Behbahani AG. Comparison of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2015;7(1):28–31. DOI: 10.15171/jcvtr.2014.06. PMID: 25859313. PMCID: PMC4378672.
  18. Brown SM, Grissom CK, Moss M, Rice TW, Schoenfeld D, Hou PC, et al. NIH/NHLBI PETAL Network Collaborators. Nonlinear imputation of PaO2/FiO2 from SpO2/FiO2 among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 2016;150(2):307–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.003. PMID: 26836924 PMCID: PMC4980543.
  19. Bashar FR, Vahedian-Azimi A, Farzanegan B, Goharani R, Shojaei S, Hatamian S, et al. Comparison of non-invasive to invasive oxygenation ratios for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective derivation-validation cohort study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;13:123. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-018-0804-8.
  20. Vadi S. Correlation of oxygen index, oxygen saturation index, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in invasive mechanically ventilated adults. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):54–55. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23506. PMID: 33603302; PMCID: PMC7874290.
  21. Jubran A. Pulse oximetry. Crit Care 2015;19(1):272. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0984-8. PMCID: PMC4504215 PMID: 26179876.
  22. Wongsrichanalai V. Correlation between SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in ARDS. CHEST J Crit Care 2019;155(4 Suppl):98A. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.097.
  23. Rhea Louela Jusi, Encarnita Limpin, Rommel Bayot, Teresita De Guia, Fernando Ayuyao. Determination of critical threshold value of SPO2/FiO2 ratio in the diagnosis of acute lung injury. European Respiratory Journal Sep 2012, 40 (Suppl 56) P2020.
  24. DesPrez K, McNeil JB, Wang C, Bastarache JA, Shaver CM, Ware LB, et al. Oxygenation saturation index predicts clinical outcomes in ARDS. Chest 2017;152(6):1151–1158. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.002. PMID: 28823812. PMCID: PMC5812755.
  25. Chen W, Janz DR, Shaver CM, Bernard GR, Bastarache JA, Ware LB. Clinical characteristics and outcomes are similar in ARDS diagnosed by oxygen saturation/FiO2 ratio compared with PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Chest 2015;148(6):1477–1483. DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-0169. PMID: 2627102.
  26. Kangelaris KN, Ware LB, Wang CY, Janz DR, Hanjing Z, Matthay MA. Timing of intubation and clinical outcomes in adults with ARDS. Crit Care Med 2016;44(1):120–129. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001359. PMCID: PMC4774861. NIHMSID: NIHMS753236. PMID: 26474112.
  27. Pandharipande P, Shintani A, Hagerman H, St Jacques P, Rice T, Sanders N, et al. Derivation and validation of SpO2/FiO2 ratio to impute for PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Crit Care Med 2009;37(4):1317–1321. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819cefa9. PMID: 19242333. PMCID: PMC3776410.
  28. Laila DS, Yoel C, Hakimi H, Lubis M. Comparison of SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 ratios as markers of acute lung injury. Paediatr Indones 2017;57(1):30–34. DOI: 10.14238/pi57.1.2017.30-4.
  29. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, Ware LB. Comparison of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest 2007;132(2):410–417. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-0617.
  30. Kwack WG, Lee DS, Min H, Choi YY, Yun M, Kim Y. Evaluation of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio as a predictor of intensive care unit transfers in respiratory ward patients for whom the rapid response system has been activated. PLOS One 2018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201632.
  31. Chan ED, Chan MM, Chan MM. Pulse oximetry: understanding its basic principles facilitates appreciation of its limitations. Respir Med 2013;107(6):789–799. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.02.004.
  32. Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Behera D, Agarwal R. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: pulmonary and extrapulmonary not so similar. Indian J Crit Care Med 2016;20(3):194–197. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.178188.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.