Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 26 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Doppler-estimated Carotid and Brachial Artery Flow as Surrogate for Cardiac Output: Needs Further Validation

Velmurugan Selvam

Keywords : Brachial artery velocity time integral, Carotid artery velocity time integral, Fluid responsiveness, Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral

Citation Information : Selvam V. Doppler-estimated Carotid and Brachial Artery Flow as Surrogate for Cardiac Output: Needs Further Validation. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26 (2):159-160.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24108

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


  1. Acheampong A, Vincent J-L. A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. Crit Care 2015;19(1):251. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0970-1.
  2. Rosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park PK, Bartlett RH, NIH NHLBI ARDS Network. Review of a large clinical series: association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: a retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. J Intensive Care Med 2009;24(1):35–46. DOI: 10.1177/0885066608329850.
  3. Hernández G, Teboul J-L. Fourth surviving sepsis campaign's hemodynamic recommendations: a step forward or a return to chaos? Crit Care 2017;21(1):133. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1708-z.
  4. Jozwiak M, Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Teboul J-L. Fluid resuscitation during early sepsis: a need for individualization. Minerva Anestesiol 2018;84(8):987–992. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12422-9.
  5. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007;35(1):64–68. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F.
  6. Mallat J, Meddour M, Durville E, Lemyze M, Pepy F, Temime J, et al. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2015;115(3):449–456. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev222.
  7. Boyd JH, Sirounis D, Maizel J, Slama M. Echocardiography as a guide for fluid management. Crit Care 2016;20(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1407-1.
  8. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Assessment of volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation: recent advances. Crit Care 2013:385–396. DOI: 10.1186/cc12526.
  9. Weber U, Glassford NJ, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R, Hilton AK. A pilot assessment of carotid and brachial artery blood flow estimation using ultrasound doppler in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016;30(1):141–148. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.06.025.
  10. Weber U, Glassford NJ, Eastwood GM, Bellomo R, Hilton AK. A pilot study of the relationship between Doppler-estimated carotid and brachial artery flow and cardiac index. Anaesthesia 2015;70(10): 1140–1147. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13069.
  11. Chowhan G, Kundu R, Maitra S, Arora MK, Batra RK, Subramaniam R, et al. Efficacy of left ventricular outflow tract and carotid artery velocity time integral as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(3): 310–316. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23764.
  12. Sidor M, Premachandra L, Hanna B, Nair N, Misra A. Carotid flow as a surrogate for cardiac output measurement in hemodynamically stable participants. J Intensive Care Med 2020;35(7):650–655. DOI: 10.1177/0885066618775694.
  13. Joshi M, Dhakane P, Bhosale SJ, Phulambrikar R, Kulkarni AP. Correlation between Carotid and Brachial Artery Velocity Time Integral and Their Comparison to Pulse Pressure Variation and Stroke Volume Variation for Assessing Fluid Responsiveness. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(2):179–184.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.