Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 26 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Serial Ultrasonographic-measurement of Gastric Residual Volume in Critically Ill Patients for Prediction of Gastric Tube Feed Intolerance

Basavaraj Ankalagi, Preet Mohinder Singh, Vimi Rewari, Rashmi Ramachandran, Debashish Das, Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan, Deep Narayan Srivastava, Manpreet Kaur

Keywords : Enteral feed intolerance, Gastric residual volume, Intensive care, Intensive care unit, Nasogastric feeding, Ultrasound

Citation Information : Ankalagi B, Singh PM, Rewari V, Ramachandran R, Das D, Madhusudhan KS, Srivastava DN, Kaur M. Serial Ultrasonographic-measurement of Gastric Residual Volume in Critically Ill Patients for Prediction of Gastric Tube Feed Intolerance. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26 (9):987-992.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24296

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-08-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Objective: To study the use of serial ultrasound gastric residual volume (GRV) measurements in predicting feed intolerance in critically ill patients. Patients and methods: This study was conducted in various intensive care units (ICUs) of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Forty-three critically ill patients aged more than 18 years were studied for a total of 130 enteral feeding days. Gastric residual volume was obtained by calculating the antral cross-sectional area (CSA), which is the product of anteroposterior (AP) and craniocaudal (CC) diameters of gastric antrum obtained using ultrasound in the right lateral decubitus position. A baseline measurement was done before the initiation of the enteral feed and termed GRV0, the ultrasound scanning was repeated every 1 hour for the first 4 hours and termed GRV1, GRV2, GRV3, and GRV4, respectively, and the patients were watched for feed intolerance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to correlate the GRV at each time with feed intolerance. Results: The data from 43 medical and surgical critically ill patients were analyzed. Out of 130 feeding days, 13 were noted to be feed intolerant. Gastric residual volume at the end of the fourth hour of feed, that is, GRV4 was the best predictor of feed intolerance with 99.3% area under the curve (AUROC), sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 99.3%, and 95% CI, 0.89–0.98 followed by GRV3, with AUROC of 96% and sensitivity and specificity of 92.3 and 96%, respectively, with 95% CI, 0.92–0.99.

PDF Share
  1. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2016;40(2):159−211. DOI: 10.1177/0148607115621863.
  2. Elke G, Felbinger TW, Heyland DK. Gastric residual volume in critically ill patients: a dead marker or still alive? Nutr Clin Pract 2015;30(1): 59–71. DOI: 10.1177/0884533614562841.
  3. Dalhoff K, Abele–Horn M, Andreas S, Bauer T, von Baum H, Deja M, et al. [Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia. S-3 Guideline of the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society for Infectious Diseases, the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology, the German Respiratory Society and the Paul–Ehrlich–Society for Chemotherapy]. Pneumologie 2021;66(12):707–765. In German. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325924.
  4. Nseir S, Zerimech F, Jaillette E, Artru F, Balduyck M. Microaspiration in intubated critically ill patients: diagnosis and prevention. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2011;11(4);413–423. DOI: 10.2174/187152611796504827.
  5. McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, DiSario JA, Heyland DK, Maloney JP, et al. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: consensus statement. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002;26:S80–S85. DOI: 10.1177/014860710202600613.
  6. Hsu CW, Sun SF, Lee DL, Lin SL, Wong KF, Huang HH, et al. Impact of disease severity on gastric residual volume in critical patients. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17(15):2007–2012. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.2007.
  7. Kruisselbrink R, Arzola C, Endersby R, Tse C, Chan V, Perlas A. Intra- and interrater reliability of ultrasound assessment of gastric volume. Anesthesiology 2014;121:46–51. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.00000 00000000193.
  8. Taskin G, Inal V, Yamanel L. Does ultrasonographic assessment of gastric antrum correlate with gastric residual volume in critically ill patients? A prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput 2021;35(4):923–929. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00707-y.
  9. Hamada SR, Garcon P, Ronot M, Kerever S, Paugam–Burtz C, Mantz J. Ultrasound assessment of gastric volume in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2014;40(7):965–972. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3320-x.
  10. Arzola C, Carvalho JCA, Cubillos J, Ye XY, Perlas A. Anesthesiologists’ learning curves for bedside qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content: a cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2013;60:771–779. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-013-9974-y.
  11. Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, Cino M, Haldipur N, Davis L, et al. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesth Analg 2013;116:357–363. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318274fc19.
  12. Moreira TV, McQuiggan M. Methods for the assessment of gastric emptying in critically ill, enterally fed adults. Nutr Clin Pract 2009;24(2):261–273. DOI: 10.1177/0884533609332176.
  13. Irvine EJ, Tougas G, Lappalainen R, Bathurst NC. Reliability and interobserver variability of ultrasonographic measurement of gastric emptying rate. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38(5):803–810. DOI: 10.1007/BF01295904.
  14. Hveem K, Jones KL, Chatterton BE, Horowitz M. Scintigraphic measurement of gastric emptying and ultrasonographic assessment of antral area: relation to appetite. Gut 1996;38(6):816–821. DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.6.816.
  15. van de Putte P, Perlas A. Gastric sonography in the severely obese surgical patient: a feasibility study. Anesth Analg 2014;119(5): 1105–1110. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000373.
  16. van de Putte P, van Hoonacker J, Perlas A. Gastric ultrasound to guide anesthetic management in elective surgical patients non-compliant with fasting instructions: a retrospective cohort study. Minerva Anestesiol 2018;84(7):787–795. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12305-9.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.