Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 27 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2023 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

The Comparative Efficacy of Ceftazidime–Avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxins for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

M Vijayakumar, Velmurugan Selvam, MK Renuka, Ram Eachambadi Rajagopalan

Keywords : Aztreonam, Carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales, Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae, Cohort study, Ceftazidime–avibactam, Colistin, Intensive care unit, Observational study, Polymyxin B, Prospective

Citation Information : Vijayakumar M, Selvam V, Renuka M, Rajagopalan RE. The Comparative Efficacy of Ceftazidime–Avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxins for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023; 27 (12):923-929.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24577

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-11-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is associated with high mortality in critically ill patients, with limited treatment options. This study aims to compare clinical response, microbiological response, and mortality in patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam with or without aztreonam (CAZ–AVI + AZT) and colistin or polymyxin B (polymyxins) in CRE infections. Materials and methods: This single-center prospective observational study included adult patients with CRE infections treated with CAZ–AVI+AZT or polymyxins between January 2022 and December 2022 at a Tertiary Care Medical Center in India. The clinical response, microbiological response, and mortality were compared between the two groups using a Cox multivariate regression model adjusted for the baseline SOFA score and comorbidities. Results: A total of 89 patients were enrolled, with 59 (66%) patients receiving CAZ–AVI + AZT and 30 receiving polymyxins. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. The Cox multivariate regression analysis showed a statistically significant difference in clinical failure on day 14 with the CAZ–AVI + AZT group vs polymyxins (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.95, p = 0.018). There was no difference in microbiological failure (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.66–1.77, p = 0.76), microbiological relapse (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.36–3.02, p = 0.62), and hospital mortality (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.75–1.43, p = 0.796) between the two groups. Conclusion: Treatment with ceftazidime–avibactam with or without aztreonam for CRE infections associated with a better clinical response compared with polymyxins monotherapy but without any difference in microbiological response or mortality.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE); Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/cre/index.html.
  2. Mehrad B, Clark NM, Zhanel GG, Lynch III JP. Antimicrobial resistance in hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacterial infections. Chest 2015;147(5):1413–1421. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-2171.
  3. Stewardson AJ, Marimuthu K, Sengupta S, Allignol A, El-Bouseary M, Carvalho MJ, et al. Effect of carbapenem resistance on outcomes of bloodstream infection caused by Enterobacteriaceae in low-income and middle-income countries (PANORAMA): A multinational prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;19(6):601–610. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30792-8.
  4. Snyder BM, Montague BT, Anandan S, Madabhushi AG, Pragasam AK, Verghese VP, et al. Risk factors and epidemiologic predictors of bloodstream infections with New Delhi Metallo-b-lactamase (NDM-1) producing Enterobacteriaceae. Epidemiol Infect 2019;147:e137. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268819000256.
  5. Patel G, Huprikar S, Factor SH, Jenkins SG, Calfee DP. Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniaee infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(12):1099–1106. DOI: 10.1086/592412.
  6. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, Van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidance on the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis 2021;72(7):e169–e183. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1478.
  7. Doi Y. Treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69(Suppl 7):S565–S575. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz830.
  8. Shaw E, Rombauts A, Tubau F, Padullés A, Càmara J, Lozano T, et al. Clinical outcomes after combination treatment with ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam for NDM-1/OXA-48/CTX-M-15-producing Klebsiella pneumoniaee infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73(4):1104–1106. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx496.
  9. van Duin D, Lok JJ, Earley M, Cober E, Richter SS, Perez F, et al. Colistin versus ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66(2):163–171. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix783.
  10. Falcone M, Daikos GL, Tiseo G, Bassoulis D, Giordano C, Galfo V, et al. Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam in patients with bloodstream infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase–producing enterobacterales. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72(11):1871–1878. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa586.
  11. Hakeam HA, Alsahli H, Albabtain L, Alassaf S, Al Duhailib Z, Althawadi S. Effectiveness of ceftazidime–avibactam versus colistin in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. Int J Infect Dis 2021;109:1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.079.
  12. Nagvekar V, Shah A, Unadkat VP, Chavan A, Kohli R, Hodgar S, et al. Clinical outcome of patients on ceftazidime–avibactam and combination therapy in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(7):780–784. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23863.
  13. Walia K, Ohri VC, Madhumathi J, Ramasubramanian V. Policy document on antimicrobial stewardship practices in India. Indian J Med Res 2019;149(2):180–184. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_147_18.
  14. Prayag PS, Patwardhan SA, Panchakshari S, Sambasivam R, Dhupad S, Soman RN, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without aztreonam vs polymyxin-based combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(6):444–450. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24481.
  15. Kahlmeter G, Brown DF, Goldstein FW, MacGowan AP, Mouton AW, Odenholt I, et al. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12(6):501–503. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01454.x.; Li J, Lovern M, Green ML, Chiu J, Zhou D, Comisar C, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam population pharmacokinetic modeling and pharmacodynamic target attainment across adult indications and patient subgroups. Clin Transl Sci 2019;12(2):151–163. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12585.
  16. Cornely OA, Cisneros JM, Torre-Cisneros J, Rodríguez-Hernández MJ, Tallón-Aguilar L, Calbo E, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: Results from the REJUVENATE study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020;75(3):618–627. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz497.
  17. Tsuji BT, Pogue JM, Zavascki AP, Paul M, Daikos GL, Forrest A, et al. International consensus guidelines for the optimal use of the polymyxins: endorsed by the American college of clinical pharmacy (ACCP), European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID), infectious diseases society of America (IDSA), international society for anti-infective pharmacology (ISAP), society of critical care medicine (SCCM), and society of infectious diseases pharmacists (SIDP). Pharmacotherapy 2019;39(1):10–39. DOI: 10.1002/phar.2209.
  18. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173(6):676–682. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq433.
  19. Cheng IL, Chen YH, Lai CC, Tang HJ. Intravenous colistin monotherapy versus combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria infections: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med 2018;7(8):208. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7080208.
  20. Paul M, Daikos GL, Durante-Mangoni E, Yahav D, Carmeli Y, Benattar YD, et al. Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: An open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18(4):391–400. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30099-9.
  21. Kaye KS, Marchaim D, Thamlikitkul V, Carmeli Y, Chiu CH, Daikos G, et al. Colistin monotherapy versus combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant organisms. NEJM Evid 2022;2(1). DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2200131.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.