Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  28 (2024)
Volume  27 (2023)
Volume  26 (2022)
Volume  25 (2021)
Volume  24 (2020)
Volume  23 (2019)
Volume  22 (2018)
Volume  21 (2017)
Volume  20 (2016)
Volume  19 (2015)
Volume  18 (2014)
Volume  17 (2013)
Volume  16 (2012)
Volume  15 (2011)
Volume  14 (2010)
Volume  13 (2009)
Volume  12 (2008)
Volume  11 (2007)
Volume  10 (2006)
Volume  9 (2005)
Volume  8 (2004)
Related articles

VOLUME 27 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2023 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test

Mohamed Kamal, Mominah Bhatti, Warren Christopher Stewart, Moira Johns, David Collins, Yahya Shehabi, Solomon Rajesh Thambiraj, Sumesh Arora

Keywords : COVID-19, Eye protection, Fit Test, Goggles, N95 respirators, Personal protective equipment

Citation Information : Kamal M, Bhatti M, Stewart WC, Johns M, Collins D, Shehabi Y, Thambiraj SR, Arora S. Safety Goggles with Elastic Headband to Improve N95 Fit Following Failed Quantitative Fit Test. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023; 27 (6):386-391.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24473

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction: N95 respirators, together with eye protection, form vital elements of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers (HCW) caring for patients with respiratory infections, such as COVID-19. Duckbill N95 respirators are widely used but have a high failure rate when Fit Tested. The commonest site for inward leaks is the region between the nose and maxilla. Safety goggles with an elastic headband may press the upper rim of the respirator against the face, thereby reducing inward leaks. We hypothesized that the use of safety goggles with an elastic headband will improve the overall fit-factor of a duckbill N95 respirator and increase the proportion of users who pass a quantitative Fit Test. Methods: About 60 volunteer HCWs, who had previously failed quantitative Fit Testing with a duckbill N95 respirator, participated in this before-and-after intervention study. A PortaCount® 8048 was used for quantitative Fit Testing. The test was first performed with a duckbill N95 respirator only. It was then repeated after participants donned a pair of safety goggles (3M Fahrenheit, ID 70071531621). Results: Before the intervention, i.e., with the respirator only, 8 (13.3%) participants passed their Fit Test. This increased to 49 (81.7%) after the application of safety goggles (OR 42, 95% CI 7.14–1697.9, p < 0.0001). The adjusted mean overall fit factor, using Tobit regression analysis, increased from 40.3 to 193.0 (t = 12.32, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of safety goggles with an elastic headband significantly increases the proportion of users who pass a quantitative Fit Test and improves the fit-factor of a duckbill N95 respirator.

HTML PDF Share
  1. WHO. Infection Prevention and Control during Healthcare when Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) is Suspected or Confirmed; 2021.
  2. Australian Department of Health. Guidance on the Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Hospitals during the COVID-19 Outbreak; 2020.
  3. NSW Clinical Excellence Commission. Respiratory Protection Program Manual. 1st edition; 2020.
  4. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Graham MS, Joshi AD, Guo CG, Ma W, et al. Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5(9):e475–e483. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X.
  5. Patel MP, Kute VB, Goswami J, Balwani MR. Hospitals may become “Disease Hotspots” for COVID-19 amid shortage of personal protective equipment. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(11):1145–1146. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23645.
  6. Ramasubban S. COVID collateral: “Don't forget the diligent healthcare worker”. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(8):613–614. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23542.
  7. Duling MG, Lawrence RB, Slaven JE, Coffey CC. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007;4(6):420–431. DOI: 10.1080/15459620701346925.
  8. Danyluk Q, Hon CY, Neudorf M, Yassi A, Bryce E, Janssen B, et al. Health care workers and respiratory protection: Is the user seal check a surrogate for respirator Fit Testing? J Occup Environ Hyg 2011;8(5):267–270. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.566016.
  9. Hon CY, Danyluk Q, Bryce E, Janssen B, Neudorf M, Yassi A, et al. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative Fit Testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector. J Occup Environ Hyg 2017;14(3):175–179. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237030.
  10. Lawrence RB, Duling MG, Calvert CA, Coffey CC. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices. J Occup Environ Hyg 2006;3(9):465–474. DOI: 10.1080/15459620600829211.
  11. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Fit Testing Procedures; Part I. OSHA-Accepted Fit Test Protocols. USA Department of Labor; 2004.
  12. Chu DK, Akl PEA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schunemann HJ, et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2020;395(10242):1973–1987. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.040.
  13. Milosevic M, Kishore Biswas R, Innes L, Ng M, Mehmet Darendeliler A, Wong A, et al. P2/N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Results of a large-scale quantitative mask fit testing program in Australian health care workers. Am J Infect Control 2022;50(5):509–515. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.016.
  14. Harber P, Su J, Badilla AD, Rahimian R, Lansey KR. Potential role of infrared imaging for detecting facial seal leaks in filtering facepiece respirator users. J Occup Environ Hyg 2015;12(6):369–375. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1006636.
  15. Roberge RJ, Monaghan WD, Palmiero AJ, Shaffer R, Bergman MS. Infrared imaging for leak detection of N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A pilot study. Am J Ind Med 2011;54(8):628–636. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20970.
  16. Johns M, Kyaw S, Lim R, Stewart WC, Thambiraj SR, Shehabi Y, et al. Fit factor change on quantitative fit testing of Duckbill N95 respirators with the use of safety goggles. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(9):981–986. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23972.
  17. Todi S. Clearing the fog on the use of N95 mask. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(9):961–962.
  18. TSI. PortaCount Respirator Fit Tester – User Manual. P/N 6010633, Revision P; 2021.
  19. Haji JY, Subramaniam A, Kumar P, Ramanathan K, Rajamani A. State of personal protective equipment practice in Indian Intensive Care Units amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(9):809–816. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23550.
  20. Chawla G, Abrol N, Kakkar K. Personal protective equipment: A Pandora's box. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(5):371–372. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23443.
  21. Degesys NF, Wang RC, Kwan E, Fahimi J, Noble JA, Raven MC. Correlation between N95 extended use and reuse and fit failure in an Emergency Department. JAMA 2020;324(1):94–96. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.9843.
  22. Wardhan R, Brennan MM, Brown HL, Creech TB. Does a modified adhesive respirator improve the face seal for health care workers who previously failed a fit test?: A pilot study during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. A A Pract 2020;14(8):e01264. DOI: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001264.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.