Citation Information :
Albadry AM, Zakaria HY, Elhefny MM, Elsherif IM. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous vs Intermittent Linezolid Infusion in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024; 28 (12):1118-1121.
The synthetic antimicrobial agent Linezolid effectively penetrates many tissues and exhibits effectiveness against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. This agent's pharmacokinetic qualities cast doubt on the need for intravenous treatment in cases of serious illness. For its time-dependent action to have an impact, serum levels must stay above the minimum inhibitory concentration throughout the dosage interval. According to our research, Linezolid infusions have been proposed to be given as continuous infusions to maintain adequate tissue and serum levels without trough concentration fluctuations. This will optimize the drug's effects and protect against toxicity and drug resistance. In critically ill individuals experiencing septic shock in the ICU, this study sought to validate the safety and efficacy of continuous Linezolid infusion in comparison to the conventional regimen. A prospective, randomized, controlled research involving 140 individuals suffering from septic shock who were older than 18 was carried out. Two groups of patients were randomly assigned. With an average treatment duration of 9.83 ± 2.537 in the intermittent infusion group and 7.39 ± 1.653 in the continuous infusion group, the first group obtained IV linezolid 600 mg twice daily as an intermittent infusion (II) over 60 minutes, whereas the second group obtained 300 mg IV as a loading dosage, and then continuous infusion of 900 mg/day in the first day and 1,200 mg/day in the subsequent days. There was a significantly high clinical cure and less ICU and hospital stay in the continuous infusion group (p < 0.001). Moreover, there was a lower incidence of developing thrombocytopenia in patients with renal impairment who got continuous infusion. Continuous infusion modality showed an advantage in terms of enhancing clinical efficacy in seriously ill cases with septic shock secondary to Gram-positive bacterial infection, especially in cases with renal impairment.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane, D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315(8):801–810. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–1554. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022139.
Juneja D, Nasa P, Chanchalani G, Cherian A, Jagiasi BG, Javeri, Y, et al. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine position statement on the management of sepsis in resource-limited settings. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S4–S19. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24682.
Singh V, Agarwal J, Nath SS, Sharma A. Evaluation of direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing from positive flagged blood cultures in sepsis patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(4):387. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24687.
Wang, Y, Zou Y, Xie J, Wang T, Zheng X, He H, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: A systematic review employing meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015;71(1):107–115. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-014-1775-x.
Rayner CR, Forrest A, Meagher AK, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. Clinical pharmacodynamics of linezolid in seriously ill patients treated in a compassionate use programme. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003;42(1):1411–1423. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200342150-00007.
Dryden MS. Linezolid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in clinical treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66(S4):iv7–iv15. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr072.
Zoller M, Maier B, Hornuss C, Neugebauer C, Döbbeler G, Nagel D, et al. Variability of linezolid concentrations after standard dosing in critically ill patients: A prospective observational study. Critical Care 2014;18(4):1–11. DOI: 10.1186/cc13984.
Adembri C, Fallani S, Cassetta MI, Arrigucci S, Ottaviano A, Pecile P, et al. Linezolid pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile in critically ill septic patients: Intermittent versus continuous infusion. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008;31(2):122–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.09.009.
El-Gaml RM, El-Khodary NM, Abozahra RR, El-Tayar AA, El-Masry SM. Applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic measurements for linezolid in critically ill patients: Optimizing efficacy and reducing resistance occurrence. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022;78(8):1301–1310. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03340-z.
De Pascale G, Fortuna S, Tumbarello M, Cutuli SL, Vallecoccia M, Spanu T, et al. Linezolid plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations in critically ill obese patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: Intermittent vs continuous administration. Intensive Care Med 2015;41(1):103–110. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3550-y.
Abou Warda AE, Sarhan RM, Al-Fishawy HS, Moharram AN, Salem HF. Continuous versus intermittent linezolid infusion for critically ill patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: Efficacy and safety challenges. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022;15(3):296. DOI: 10.3390/ph15030296.
Taubert M, Zander J, Frechen S, Scharf C, Frey L, Vogeser M, et al. Optimization of linezolid therapy in the critically ill: The effect of adjusted infusion regimens. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72(8):2304–2310. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx149.
Soraluce A, Barrasa H, Asín-Prieto E, Sánchez-Izquierdo JÁ, Maynar J, Isla A, et al. Novel population pharmacokinetic model for linezolid in critically ill patients and evaluation of the adequacy of the current dosing recommendation. Pharmaceutics 2020;12(1):54. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12010054.
Mira JC, Gentile LF, Mathias BJ, Efron PA, Brakenridge SC, Mohr AM, et al. Sepsis pathophysiology, chronic critical illness, and persistent inflammation-immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome. Crit Care Med 2017;45(2):253–262. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002074.
Di Paolo A, Malacarne P, Guidotti E, Danesi R, Del Tacca M. Pharmacological issues of linezolid: An updated critical review. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010;49(7):439–447. DOI: 10.2165/11319960-000000000-00000.
Slatter JG, Stalker DJ, Feenstra KL, Welshman IR, Bruss JB, Sams JP, et al. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of linezolid following an oral dose of [(14)C] linezolid to healthy human subjects. Drug Metab Dispos 2001;29(8):1136–1145. DOI: 0090-9556/01/2908-1136–1145$3.00.
Takahashi Y, Takesue Y, Nakajima K, Ichiki K, Tsuchida T, Tatsumi S, et al. Risk factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia in patients who received linezolid therapy. J Infect Chemother 2011;17(3):382–387. DOI: 10.1007/s10156-010-0182-1.
Kurihara C, Inoue K, Kai H, Suzuki K, Saeki H, Funabashi Y, et al. Our “WMA declaration of Helsinki”: Opinions and proposals from patient and public for research ethics. In Ethical Innovation for Global Health: Pandemic, Democracy and Ethics in Research. Springer Nature Singapore. 2023;243–269.
Buerger C, Plock N, Dehghanyar P, Joukhadar C, Kloft C. Pharmacokinetics of unbound linezolid in plasma and tissue interstitium of critically ill patients after multiple dosing using microdialysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50(7):2455–2463. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01468-05.
Mimoz O, Montravers P, Paiva JA. Continuous administration of linezolid in pneumonia: What is the level of proof? Intensive Care Med 2015;41(1):157–159. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3572-5.