Comparison of Braden Score vs APACHE to Predict Occurrence of Bed Sores in a Tertiary Care ICU
Khuram Maqbool, Munish Chauhan, Sandeep Dewan
Keywords :
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, Braden score, Pressure sores
Citation Information :
Maqbool K, Chauhan M, Dewan S. Comparison of Braden Score vs APACHE to Predict Occurrence of Bed Sores in a Tertiary Care ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025; 29 (2):164-169.
Introduction: Pressure sores, or bedsores, pose a challenge in intensive care unit (ICU) care due to patients’ immobility and compromised circulation. This study explores the effectiveness of the Braden Scale and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) in predicting pressure sore occurrences.
Materials and methods: Conducted over a year in an Indian ICU, this observational study assessed the predictive capability of both scores. Participants (≥18 years) underwent Braden and APACHE II assessments upon admission, with daily monitoring for pressure sore development. Statistical analysis compared scores and ulcer occurrences.
Results: Older patients, particularly males, showed a higher tendency for ICU admission. 20.3% had pressure ulcers, significantly correlating with lower Braden and higher APACHE II scores. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II showed superior efficiency in predicting ulcers.
Discussion: While Braden scores’ variability was less in ICU patients, APACHE II scores reflected acute illness severity, strongly correlating with ulcer incidence. The study advocates for a combined utilization of both scores for tailored interventions.
Conclusion: Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II demonstrated better efficiency in predicting pressure ulcers, while the Braden score remains valuable for focused assessments. The study highlights the importance of considering age, gender, acute health status, and localized risk factors in ICU pressure ulcer assessment.
Future directions: Further research might explore integrated scoring systems or protocols combining the strengths of both scores for more precise risk assessment in ICU settings.
Shi C, Dumville JC, Cullum N, Rhodes S, McInnes E, Goh EL, et al. Beds, overlays and mattresses for preventing and treating pressure ulcers: An overview of Cochrane Reviews and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;(8):CD013761. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013768.pub2.
Jaul E, Barron J, Rosenzweig JP, Menczel J. An overview of co-morbidities and the development of pressure ulcers among older adults. BMC Geriatr 2018;18(1):305. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0815-4.
Shea JD. Pressure sores classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;112:89–100. PMID: 1192654.
Bergstrom N. The Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nurs Res 1987;36(4):205–210. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-198707000-00002.
Wagner DP, Draper EA. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Medicare reimbursement. Health Care Financing Review 1984;1984(Suppl):91–105. PMID: 10311080.
Lee MA, Choi KK, Yu B, Park JJ, Park Y, Gwak J, et al. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score and sequential organ failure assessment score as predictors for severe trauma patients in the intensive care unit. Korean Korean J Crit Care Med 2017;32(4):340–346. DOI: 10.4266/kjccm.2017.00255.
Santos EM, Farias LC, Santos SHS, de Paula AMB, Oliveira e Silva CS, Guimarães ALS. Molecular finds of pressure ulcer: A bioinformatics approach in pressure ulcer. J Tissue Viability 2017;26(2):119–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.01.002.
Yamazaki S, Sekiguchi A, Uchiyama A, Fujiwara C, Inoue Y, Yokoyama Y, et al. Apelin/APJ signaling suppresses the pressure ulcer formation in cutaneous ischemia-reperfusion injury mouse model. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):1349. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58452-2.
Shahin ES, Dassen T, Halfens RJ. Incidence, prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers in intensive care patients: A longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46(4):413–421. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.006.
Tang W, Zha ML, Zhang WQ, Hu SQ, Chen HL. APACHE scoring system and pressure injury risk for intensive care patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wound Repair Regen 2022;30(4):498–508. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13064.
Saghaleini SH, Dehghan K, Shadvar K, Sanaie S, Mahmoodpoor A, Ostadi Z. Pressure ulcer and nutrition. Indian J Crit Care Med 2018;22(4):283–289. DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_249_17.