Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  29 (2025)
Volume  28 (2024)
Volume  27 (2023)
Volume  26 (2022)
Volume  25 (2021)
Volume  24 (2020)
Volume  23 (2019)
Volume  22 (2018)
Volume  21 (2017)
Volume  20 (2016)
Volume  19 (2015)
Volume  18 (2014)
Volume  17 (2013)
Volume  16 (2012)
Volume  15 (2011)
Volume  14 (2010)
Volume  13 (2009)
Volume  12 (2008)
Volume  11 (2007)
Volume  10 (2006)
Volume  9 (2005)
Volume  8 (2004)
Related articles

VOLUME 29 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2025 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Atul P Kulkarni, Shilpushp J Bhosale, Kushal R Kalvit, Swapna Cherian, Anjana M Shrivastava, Manoj R Gorade

Keywords : Critically ill patients, Difficult intubation, Hypoxia, MACOCHA score, Severe cardiovascular collapse

Citation Information : Kulkarni AP, Bhosale SJ, Kalvit KR, Cherian S, Shrivastava AM, Gorade MR. Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025; 29 (3):208-214.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24934

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-02-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction: Tracheal intubation (TI) is often needed in the intensive care unit (ICU) but can have disastrous consequences. The MACOCHA score was developed for prediction of difficult intubation (DI) in critically ill. Material and methods: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, we conducted this prospective, single-center observational study. Evaluated the ability of MACOCHA score to predict difficult intubation in our ICU. We included 500 adults undergoing TI in our ICU. We collected the demographic data, details of ICU admission, and intubation-related data for calculating MACOCHA score. We used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21) for analysis. The accuracy of MACOCHA score for predicting DI was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics was used to determine calibration. Results: Since complete dataset was available for 449/500 patients, we analyzed their data. Acute renal failure and shock were the most frequent reasons for TI. Ketamine and rocuronium were most commonly used drugs for TI. The incidence of DI was 13.5% (60/449). There were 30 patients whose Mallampati score was either III and IV, while 84 and 45 patients had severe hypoxemia and coma before TI, respectively. The AUROC curve for the MACOCHA score was 0.659 (confidence interval, 0.574−0.743), suggesting a moderate discrimination. The Hosmer−Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed moderate calibration (χ2 = 3.142, with p = 0.208). One hundred and seventy-one (26.5%) complications occurred in the entire cohort. Some patients had multiple complications. Conclusion: The MACOCHA score showed moderate discrimination and calibration in predicting DI in our study.

PDF Share
  1. Smischney NJ, Khanna AK, Brauer E, Morrow LE, Ofoma UR, Kaufman DA, et al. Risk factors for and outcomes associated with peri-intubation hypoxemia: A multicenter prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2021;36(12):1466−1474. DOI: 10.1177/0885066620962445.
  2. De Jong A, Rolle A, Molinari N, Paugam-Burtz C, Constantin JM, Lefrant JY, et al. Cardiac arrest and mortality related to intubation procedure in critically ill adult patients: A multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med 2018;46(4):532−539. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002925.
  3. Nolan JP, Kelly FE. Airway challenges in critical care. Anaesthesia 2011;66(Suppl 2):81−92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06937.x.
  4. Mosier JM, Joshi R, Hypes C, Pacheco G, Valenzuela T, Sakles JC. The physiologically difficult airway. West J Emerg Med 2015;16(7):1109−1117. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2015.8.27467.
  5. Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: Results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: Intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth 2011;106(5):632−642. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer059.
  6. De Jong A, Molinari N, Terzi N, Mongardon N, Arnal JM, Guitton C, et al. Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: Development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187(8):832−839. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1851OC.
  7. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2022;136(1):31−81. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002.
  8. Luedike P, Totzeck M, Rammos C, Kindgen-Milles D, Kelm M, Rassaf T. The MACOCHA score is feasible to predict intubation failure of nonanesthesiologist intensive care unit trainees. J Crit Care 2015;30(5):876−880. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.118.
  9. Greenland KB. Airway assessment based on a three column model of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010;38(1):14−19. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1003800104.
  10. Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 1988;61(2):211−216. DOI: 10.1093/bja/61.2.211.
  11. Kumar D, Bhargava S, Sisodiya RS, Tiwari D. A comparison of Wilson risk sum score and combination of modified Mallampati classification, hyomental distance ratio, ratio of height to sternomental and thyromental distances for predicting difficult laryngoscopy in Indian population. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2020;7(50):3038−3045. DOI: 10.18410/jebmh/2020/620.
  12. Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): Proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1997;87(6):1290−1297. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005.
  13. Harris T, Lockey D. Success in physician prehospital rapid sequence intubation: What is the effect of base speciality and length of anaesthetic training? Emerg Med J 2011;28(3):225−229. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2009.088302.
  14. Bernhard M, Mohr S, Weigand MA, Martin E, Walther A. Developing the skill of endotracheal intubation: Implication for emergency medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56(2):164−171. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02547.x.
  15. Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, Tassistro E, Antolini L, Bauer P, et al. Intubation practices and adverse peri-intubation events in critically ill patients from 29 countries. JAMA 2021;325(12):1164−1172. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.1727.
  16. Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant JY, Arich C, Cohendy R, Landreau L, et al. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Med 2006;34(9):2355−2361. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233879.58720.87.
  17. Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P, Sebbane M, Muller L, Chanques G, et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study. Intensive Care Med 2010;36(2):248−255. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1717-8.
  18. Prabu NR, Chaudhari HK, Kulkarni AP, Dangi MS, Bhagat V, Siddiqui SS, et al. Compliance with intubation bundle and complications in critically ill patients: A need to revisit the bundle components! Trends Anaesth Crit Care 2022;42(2):26−33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2021.10.001.
  19. Ghosh S, Salhotra R, Arora G, Lyall A, Singh A, Kumar N, et al. Implementation of a revised Montpellier bundle on the outcome of intubation in critically ill patients: A quality improvement project. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(10):1106−1114. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24332.
  20. Koroki T, Kotani Y, Yaguchi T, Shibata T, Fujii M, Fresilli S, et al. Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Crit Care 2024;28(1):48. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04831-4.
  21. Janz DR, Casey JD, Semler MW, Russell DW, Dargin J, Vonderhaar DJ, et al. Effect of a fluid bolus on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation (PrePARE): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2019;7(12):1039−1047. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30246-2.
  22. Russell DW, Casey JD, Gibbs KW, Ghamande S, Dargin JM, Vonderhaar DJ, et al. Effect of fluid bolus administration on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill patients undergoing tracheal intubation: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022;328(3):270−279. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.9792.
  23. Mort TC. Preoxygenation in critically ill patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation. Crit Care Med 2005;33(11):2672−2675. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000187131.67594.9e.
  24. Baillard C, Fosse JP, Sebbane M, Chanques G, Vincent F, Courouble P, et al. Noninvasive ventilation improves preoxygenation before intubation of hypoxic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174(2):171−177. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200509-1507OC.
  25. Schwartz DE, Matthay MA, Cohen NH. Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults. A prospective investigation of 297 tracheal intubations. Anesthesiology 1995;82(2):367−376. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199502000-00007.
  26. Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock DR. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(10):1835−1842. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6.
  27. Martin LD, Mhyre JM, Shanks AM, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S. 3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: Airway outcomes and complications. Anesthesiology 2011;114(1):42−48. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201c415.
  28. Mayo PH, Hegde A, Eisen LA, Kory P, Doelken P. A program to improve the quality of emergency endotracheal intubation. J Intensive Care Med 2011;26(1):50−56. DOI: 10.1177/0885066610384070.
  29. Simpson GD, Ross MJ, McKeown DW, Ray DC. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: A multi-centre national study of practice and complications. Br J Anaesth 2012;108(5):792−729. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer504.
  30. Corl KA, Dado C, Agarwal A, Azab N, Amass T, Marks SJ, et al. A modified Montpellier protocol for intubating intensive care unit patients is associated with an increase in first-pass intubation success and fewer complications. J Crit Care 2018;44:191−195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.014.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.