Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 4 ( October, 2005 ) > List of Articles


Effect of low tidal volumes vs conventional tidal volumes on outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill children

Ruchi Jain, Mritunjay Pao, Deepika Singhal, Rajiv Uttam, Praveen Khilnani, Anita Bakshi

Keywords : Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Children, Critically ill, Low tidal volume, Pediatrics, Ventilation

Citation Information : Jain R, Pao M, Singhal D, Uttam R, Khilnani P, Bakshi A. Effect of low tidal volumes vs conventional tidal volumes on outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill children. Indian J Crit Care Med 2005; 9 (4):195-199.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.19758

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-04-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2005; The Author(s).


Background: Adult data have shown low tidal volume strategy to be beneficial to the outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).There are little data regarding the effect of different tidal volume strategies on outcomes in children with ARDS. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to learn the differences in outcomes from ARDS in children using low vs conventional tidal volumes. Methods: All patients with ARDS (aged 1 month to 16 years) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit from March 98 to June 2004 were studied. Prospective data for low expired tidal volumes (6-8ml/kg) were collected from Jan 2001 to June 2004 (group 1). ARDS patients during March 1998 to December 2000, receiving conventional tidal volumes (10-15 ml/kg) were used as retrospective control (group 2). Etiologies, PRISMIII scores, interventions, and outcomes data were recorded. Standard supportive therapy for ARDS was used in all children using conventional mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 153 (4.67%) patients had ARDS as defined by standard criteria. Groups 1 and 2 had 78 and 65 patients, respectively, with comparable PRISMIII scores. Mortality was 23% (group 1) vs 36.9% (group 2) (P < 0.005). The mean duration of ventilation and hospitalization in group 1 was significantly lower when compared with group 2 (11 + 1 vs 18 + 2 days; P < 0.005) and group 1 (19 + 2 vs 26 + 3 days; P < 0.005), respectively. Incidence of pneumothorax was 5% (group 1) as compared with 12% (group 2) (P < 0.01). Long-term follow-up for incidence of chronic lung disease could not be studied. Common etiologies of ARDS included pneumonia, sepsis, dengue shock syndrome, falciparum malaria, and fulminant hepatic failure. Conclusions: Low tidal volume strategy was found to be associated with significantly lower duration of ventilation, hospitalization, incidence of pneumothorax, and mortality when compared with conventional tidal volume strategy in children with ARDS.

PDF Share
  1. Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Pettv TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet 1967:2:319-23.
  2. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, et al. The American European consensus conference on ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994:149:818-24.
  3. Goh AY, Chan PW, Lum LC, Roziah M. Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome: A comparison of two definitions. Arch Dis Child 1998;79:256-9.
  4. Peters MJ, Tasker RC, Kiff KM, Yates R, Hatch DJ. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children: Case mix and the utility of respiratory severity indices. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:699-705.
  5. Pelosi P. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS are different. Euro Resp J 2003;42:48-56.
  6. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301-8.
  7. Tuxen D. Permissive hypercapnic ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:870.
  8. Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R. Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intens Care Med 1990;16:372-7.
  9. Amato MB, Barbas CSV, Medeiros DM, et al. Effect of protective ventilation strategy in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;338;347-54.
  10. Bindl L, Buderus S, Dahlem P, Demirakca S, Goldner M, Huth R, et al. The ESPNIC ARDS Database Group: Gender-based differences in children with sepsis and ARDS. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1770-3.
  11. Costil J, Cloup M, Leclerc F, Devictor D, Beaufils F, Simeoni U, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children: Multicenter Collaborative Study of the French Group of Pediatric Intensive Care. Pediatr Pulmonol 1995;11:106.
  12. Flori HR, Glidden DV, Rutherford GW. Pediatric acute lung injury: Prospective evaluation of risk factors associated with mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005 (in press).
  13. Bindl I, Dresbach K, Lentze MJ. Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome in German children and adolescents: A population based study. Crit Care Med 2005;33:209-12.
  14. Timnons OD, Dean JM, Vernon DD. Mortality rates and prognostic variables in children with ARDS. J Pediatr 1991;119:896.
  15. Lodha R, Kabra SK, Pandey RM. Acute respiratory distress syndrome; experience of a tertiary care hospital. Indian Pediatr 2001;38:1154-9.
  16. Milberg JA, Davis DR, Steinberg KP, Hudson LD. Improved survival of patients with ARDS. 1983-1993. JAMA 1995;273:306-9.
  17. Khilnani P, Sarma D, Singh R, Uttam R, Rajdev S, Makkar A, et al. Demographic profile and outcome analysis of a tertiary level pediatric intensive care unit. Indian J Pediatr 2004;71:587-91.
  18. Khilnani P, Sarma D, Uttam R. Multiple organ failure in critically ill children: Experience at a tertiary Pediatric intensive care unit in India. Crit Care Med 2004;32:315, A86.
  19. Wilkinson JD, Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Glass NL, Yeh TS. Outcome of pediatric patients with multiple organ system failure. Crit Care Med 1986;14:271-4.
  20. Proulx F, Gauthier M, Nadeau D, Lacroix J, Farrell CA. Timing and predictors of death in pediatric patients with multiple organ system failure. Crit Care Med 1994;22:1025-31.
  21. Krafte-Jacobs B, Pollack M. Multiple organ system failure in children. Crit Care Med 1994;22:903-4.
  22. Tantalean JA, Leon RJ, Santos AA, Sanchez E. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2003;4:181-5.
  23. Kutko MC, Calarco MP, Flaherty MB, Helmrich RF, Ushay HM, Pon S, et al. Mortality rates in pediatric septic shock with and without multiple organ system failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2003;4:333-7.
  24. Arnold JH, Hanson JH, Toro-Figucro LO, Gutierrez J, Berens RJ, Anglin DL. Prospective randomized comparison of high frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 1994;10:1530.
  25. Royall JA, Kooy NW, Beckman JS. Nitric oxide related oxidants in acute lung injury. New Horizons 1995;3:113.
  26. Payen D, Vallet B, Genoa group. Results of the French prospective multi-centric randomized trial on inhaled nitric-oxide in ARDS. Intens Care Med 1995;25:S166.
  27. Moler FW, Pahnisano JK Custer JR, Meliones JN, Bartlett RH. Alveolar arterial oxygen gradients before extracorporcal life support for severe pediatric respiratory failure: Improved outcome for extra corporeal life support managed patients? Crit Care Med 1995;22:620.
  28. Meduri GU, Headley ST, Toucy E, Shelby M, Stentz F, Postlethwaite A. Plasma and BAL cytokine response to corticosteroid rescue treatment in late ARDS. Chest 1995;108:1315.
  29. Bernard GR, Luce JM, Spring CL, et al. High dose corticosteroids in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1564-70.
  30. Meduri GU, Chinn AJ, Leeper KV, Wunderink RG, Tolley E, Winer-Muram HT, et al. Corticosteroid rescue treatment of progressive fibroproliferation in late ARDS: patterns of response and predictors of outcome. Chest 1994;105:1516-27.
  31. Gattinoni L, Togononi G, Pesenti A, Taccone P, Mascheroni D, Labarta V, et al. Effects of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2001;345:568-73.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.