Revisiting Stewart's Approach toward Assessment of Unidentified or Complex Acid–Base Disorders

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24099

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

Online First

Revisiting Stewart's Approach toward Assessment of Unidentified or Complex Acid–Base Disorders

Keywords : Acid–Base disturbance, Albumin-corrected anion gap, Bicarbonate-based arterial blood gas analysis, High anion gap metabolic acidosis, Metabolic acidosis, Metabolic alkalosis, Stewart's approach

Citation Information : Revisiting Stewart's Approach toward Assessment of Unidentified or Complex Acid–Base Disorders. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26 (1):5-6.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24099

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-01-2022

ARTICLE
REFERENCES

Abstract

HTML PDF Share

Gunnerson KJ, Saul M, He S, Kellum JA. Lactate versus non-lactate metabolic acidosis: a retrospective outcome evaluation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006;10(1):R22–R32. DOI: 10.1186/cc3987.
Al-Jaghbeer M, Kellum JA. Acid–base disturbances in intensive care patients: etiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015;30(7):1104–1111. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu289.
Severinghaus JW, Astrup PB. History of blood gas analysis. Part II. pH and acid–base balance measurements. J Clin Monitor 1985;1(4):259–277. DOI: 10.1007/BF02832819.
Gunnerson KJ, Srisawat N, Kellum JA. Is there a difference between strong ion gap in healthy volunteers and intensive care unit patients? J Crit Care 2010;25(3):520–524. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc. 2009.11.001.
Puri S, Paul G, Sood P. Interpretation of arterial blood gas. Indian J Crit Care Med 2010;14(2):57–64. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.68215.
Chandran J, D'Silva C, Sriram S, Krishna B. Clinical utility of arterial blood gas test in an intensive care unit: an observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):172–175. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23719. PMID: 33707895; PMCID: PMC7922451.
Pande RK. Arterial blood gas: bowling wide and poor wicketkeeping. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):119–120. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals- 10071-23735.
Gezer M, Bulucu F, Ozturk K, Kilic S, Kaldirim U, Eyi YE. Effectiveness of the Stewart method in the evaluation of blood gas parameters. Turk J Emerg Med 2016;15(1):3–7. DOI: 10.5505/1304.7361.2014.73604.
Neligan PJ, Deutschman CS. Acid base balance in critical care medicine. 2005.
Paliwal R, Pakavakis A, Divatia JV, Kulkarni AP. Utility of Stewart's Approach to Diagnose Missed Complex Acid-Base Disorders as Compared to Bicarbonate-anion Gap-based Methodology in Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;26(1):23–32.
Masevicius FD, Dubin A. Has Stewart approach improved our ability to diagnose acid–base disorders in critically ill patients? World J Crit Care Med 2015;4(1):62–70. DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.62.
Forni LG, McKinnon W, Hilton PJ. Unmeasured anions in metabolic acidosis: unravelling the mystery. Crit Care 2006;10(4):220. DOI: 10.1186/cc4954.
Cusack RJ, Rhodes A, Lochhead P, Jordan B, Perry S, Ball JA, et al. The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU. Intensive Care Med 2002;28(7):864–869. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1318-2. PMID: 12122523.
Rocktaeschel J, Morimatsu H, Uchino S, Bellomo R. Unmeasured anions in critically ill patients: can they predict mortality? Crit Care Med 2003;31(8):2131–2136. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000079819.27515.8E. PMID: 12973170.
Van Den Akker JPC, Groeneveld ABJ. Do we need alternatives for bicarbonate and anion gap? Minerva Anestesiol 2013;79(10): 1111–1112. PMID: 23857449.
Kimura S, Shabsigh M, Morimatsu H. Traditional approach versus Stewart approach for acid–base disorders: Inconsistent evidence. SAGE Open Med 2018;6:2050312118801255. DOI: 10.1177/2050312118801255.
Jung B, Martinez M, Claessens YE, Darmon M, Klouche K, Lautrette A, et al. Diagnosis and management of metabolic acidosis: guidelines from a French expert panel. Ann Intensive Care 2019;9(1):92. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-019-0563-2.
Kasagi T, Imai H, Miura N, Suzuki K, Yoshino M, Nobata H, et al. Acid–base disturbances in nephrotic syndrome: analysis using the CO2/HCO3 method (traditional Boston model) and the physicochemical method (Stewart model). Clin Exp Nephrol 2017;21(5):866–876. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-017-1387-8.
Mallat J, Michel D, Salaun P, Thevenin D, Tronchon L. Defining metabolic acidosis in patients with septic shock using Stewart approach. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30(3):391–398. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.11.039.

PDF Share