Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 19 , ISSUE 8 ( 2015 ) > List of Articles

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Prehospital transport practices prevalent among patients presenting to the pediatric emergency of a tertiary care hospital

Praveen Narsaria, Pradeep Singh, Jhuma Sankar, Nishanth Dev, Nandkishore Dubey

Keywords : Auto-rickshaw, delay in transport, inter-hospital transport, mode of transport, pediatric emergency, septic shock, transport

Citation Information : Narsaria P, Singh P, Sankar J, Dev N, Dubey N. Prehospital transport practices prevalent among patients presenting to the pediatric emergency of a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med 2015; 19 (8):474-478.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.162469

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background and Objectives: Prehospital transport practices prevalent among children presenting to the emergency are under-reported. Our objectives were to evaluate the prehospital transport practices prevalent among children presenting to the pediatric emergency and their subsequent clinical course and outcome. Methods: In this prospective observational study we enrolled all children ≤17 years of age presenting to the pediatric emergency (from January to June 2013) and recorded their demographic data and variables pertaining to prehospital transport practices. Data was entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Stata 11 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Results: A total of 319 patients presented to the emergency during the study period. Acute gastroenteritis, respiratory tract infection and fever were the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency. Seventy-three (23%) children required admission. Most commonly used public transport was auto-rickshaw (138, 43.5%) and median time taken to reach hospital was 22 min (interquartile range: 5, 720). Twenty-six patients were referred from another health facility. Of these, 25 were transported in ambulance unaccompanied. About 8% (25) of parents reported having difficulties in transporting their child to the hospital and 57% (181) of parents felt fellow passengers and drivers were unhelpful. On post-hoc analysis, only time taken to reach the hospital (30 vs. 20 min; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 1.02 [1.007, 1.03], P = 0.003) and the illness nature were significant (45% vs. 2.6%; 0.58 [0.50, 0.67], P ≤ 0.0001) on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In relation to prehospital transport among pediatric patients we observed that one-quarter of children presenting to the emergency required admission, the auto-rickshaw was the commonest mode of transport and that there is a lack of prior communication before referring patients for further management.


PDF Share
  1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007. p. 2-3.
  2. Orr RA, Felmet KA, Han Y, McCloskey KA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, et al. Pediatric specialized transport teams are associated with improved outcomes. Pediatrics 2009;124:40-8.
  3. Odetola FO, Rosenberg AL, Davis MM, Clark SJ, Dechert RE, Shanley TP. Do outcomes vary according to the source of admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:20-5.
  4. Limprayoon K, Sonjaipanich S, Susiva C. Transportation of critically ill patient to pediatric intensive care unit, Siriraj Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88 Suppl 8:S86-91.
  5. Santhanam I, Pai M, Kasturi K, Radhamani MP. Mortality after admission in the pediatric emergency department: A prospective study from a referral children′s hospital in southern India. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2002;3:358-63.
  6. Centralized Ambulance Trauma Services Supporting Documents. Available from: http://www.healthmarketinnovations.org/sites/default/files/Centralized%20Ambulance%20Trauma%20Services%20Supporting%20Document%202.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 May 12].
  7. Transport in India. Available from: http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_in_India. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 24].
  8. Woodward GA, Insoft RM, Pearson-Shaver AL, Jaimovich D, Orr RA, Chambliss R, et al. The state of pediatric interfacility transport: Consensus of the second national pediatric and neonatal interfacility transport medicine leadership conference. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002;18:38-43.
  9. Stroud MH, Trautman MS, Meyer K, Moss MM, Schwartz HP, Bigham MT, et al. Pediatric and neonatal interfacility transport: Results from a national consensus conference. Pediatrics 2013;132:359-66.
  10. Karlsen KA, Trautman M, Price-Douglas W, Smith S. National survey of neonatal transport teams in the United States. Pediatrics 2011;128:685-91.
  11. Han YY, Carcillo JA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, Watson RS, Westerman ME, et al. Early reversal of pediatric-neonatal septic shock by community physicians is associated with improved outcome. Pediatrics 2003;112:793-9.
  12. Gross PA. Hypotension and mortality in septic shock: The "golden hour". Crit Care Med 2006;34:1819-20.
  13. Khilnani P, Singhi S, Lodha R, Santhanam I, Sachdev A, Chugh K, et al. Pediatric sepsis guidelines: Summary for resource-limited countries. Indian J Crit Care Med 2010;14:41-52.
  14. Stroud MH, Prodhan P, Moss MM, Anand KJ. Redefining the golden hour in pediatric transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:435-7.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.