Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 ( September, 2008 ) > List of Articles


Physician beliefs and practice regarding end-of-life care in India

V. Theodore Barnett, V. K. Aurora

Keywords : ICU, life-support, questionnaire

Citation Information : Barnett VT, Aurora VK. Physician beliefs and practice regarding end-of-life care in India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2008; 12 (3):109-115.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.43679

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2008

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2008; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Background and Aims: Physician beliefs and practices largely determine the withdrawal of life support in intensive care units. No information exists regarding beliefs regarding the withdrawal of life support among physicians in India. Materials and Methods: We performed a questionnaire at the NAPCON conference in Jaipur. Results: One hundred and twenty-two questionnaires were completed and returned. The majority of respondents did not apply do not resuscitate orders. Most physicians stated withdrawal of life support was not allowed or practiced at their institution. Thirty-five percent of physicians stated they performed life-support withdrawal. Barriers to good end-of-life care were primarily legal but also included hospital policy and social constraints. Conclusions: Pulmonary and critical care physicians in India have a lower rate of withdrawal of life support than western physicians. The reasons seem to be primarily legal and policy related. Culture and religion were not identified as barriers. Clarification of the legal and policy status of withdrawal of life support is needed

PDF Share
  1. European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: Results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 1990;16:256-64.
  2. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: The results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1626-33.
  3. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1163-7.
  4. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1961-74.
  5. Chinese and US internists adhere to different ethical standards. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14:469-73.
  6. Survey of Japanese physicians′ attitudes towards the care of adult patients in persistent vegetative state. J Med Ethics 1999;25:302-8.
  7. The constitutional and legal provisions in Indian law for limiting life support. Indian J Crit Care Med 2005;9:108-14.
  8. Critical care in India. Crit Care Clin 1997;13:317-29.
  9. Limitation of life support in the ICU: Ethical issues relating to end of life care. Indian J Crit Care Med 2003;7:112-7.
  10. End-of-life: A Hindu view. Lancet 2005;366:682-6.
  11. Attitudes of Asian-Indian Hindus toward end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:131-5
  12. The use of advance directives in a population of Asian Indian Hindus. J Transcultural Nurs 2003;14:17-24.
  13. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1272-5.
  14. al. Limiting life-prolonging interventions and providing palliative care towards the end-of-life in Indian intensive care units. Indian J Crit Care Med 2005;9:96-107.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.