Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 2 ( June, 2009 ) > List of Articles


GAP between knowledge and skills for the implementation of the ACCM/PALS septic shock guidelines in India: Is the bridge too far?

Niranjan Kissoon, Indumathy Santhanam, S. R. Kamath, Jayanthi Ramesh, Janani Shankar

Keywords : Septic shock, recognition, children, emergency department, ACCM guidelines, PALS, knowledge barriers, critical illness

Citation Information : Kissoon N, Santhanam I, Kamath SR, Ramesh J, Shankar J. GAP between knowledge and skills for the implementation of the ACCM/PALS septic shock guidelines in India: Is the bridge too far?. Indian J Crit Care Med 2009; 13 (2):54-58.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.56049

License: CC BY-ND 3.0

Published Online: 01-07-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; The Author(s).


Objective: To determine whether physicians were aware of and had the skills to implement the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Course septic shock protocol. Design: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Setting: Four academic institutions in Chennai, Manipal, Mangalore, and Trivandrum - cities representing the three southern states of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Kerala, respectively, between February and April 2006. Interventions: Pre and post lecture questions. They were evaluated using 11 questions testing knowledge and 10 questions testing their comfort level in performing interventions related to the initial resuscitation in septic shock. Measurement and Main Result: The ACCM/PALS sepsis guidelines were taught during the PALS course conducted in the four academic institutions. A total of 118 delegates participated, of whom 114 (97%) were pediatricians and four (3%) were anaesthetists. The overall mean number of correct responses for the 11 questions testing knowledge before and after the lecture was 2.1 and 4.07, respectively P=0.001(paired t test). Although, 42% of the respondents (n=50) were aware of the ACCM guidelines, 88% (n=104) did not adhere to it in their practice. A total of 86% (n=101) and 66% (n=78) did not feel comfortable titrating inotropes or intubating in the ED; 78% (n=92) and 67% (n=78), respectively felt that central venous access (CVA) and arterial pressure (AP) monitoring were unimportant in the management of fluid refractory shock. Of the physicians, 20% (n=24) had never intubated a patient, 78% (n=92) had not introduced a central venous catheter, and 76% (n=90) had never introduced an intra-arterial catheter. Conclusions: In view of the lack of skills and suboptimal knowledge, the ACCM/PALS sepsis guidelines may be inappropriate in its current format in the Indian setting. More emphasis needs to be placed on educating community pediatricians with a simpler clinical protocol, which has the potential to save many more children.

PDF Share
  1. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2000.
  2. Intravenous fluids-getting the balance right. N Engl J Med 2005;353:941-4.Das AK, Gupta SB, Joshi SR, Aggarwal P, Murmu LR, Bhoi S, et al.
  3. JAPI 2008;56:789-97.
  4. Mortality after admission in the pediatric emergency department: A prospective study from a referral children′s hospital in Southern India. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2002;3:358-63.
  5. A prospective randomized controlled study of two fluid regimens in the initial management of septic shock in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008:10: 647-55.
  6. Sepsis/ Septic shock. In: Fuhrman BP, Zimmerman JJ eds. Pediatric Critical Care. 2 nd edition. United States of America: Mosby:1998; pgs1088-1100.7)
  7. Mortality associated with multiple organ system failure and sepsis in pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr 1987;111:324-8.
  8. Crit Care Med 1986;14:271-4.
  9. Epidemiology of sepsis and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome in children. Chest 1996;109:1033-7.
  10. American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force Committee Members: Clinical parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal patients in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1365-78.
  11. Berg RA. Textbook of Pediatric Advanced life support. Dallas, TX. American Heart Association; 2002.
  12. Early reversal of pediatric-neonatal septic shock by community physicians is associated with improved outcome. Pediatrics 2003;112:793-99.
  13. The role of healthcare delivery on outcome of meningococcal disease in children: case-control study of fatal and non-fatal cases. BMJ 2005;330:1475.
  14. An outcomes comparison between ACCM-PALS implementation with and without continuous S CV O 2 monitoring for Pediatric Septic Shock. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:1065-75.
  15. ACCME guidelines use, correct antibiotic therapy, and immune suppressant withdrawal are associated with improved survival in pediatric sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004;32:S573;A161.
  16. Are we getting better? Dramatic changes in mortality in children with sepsis and purpura in Rotterdam. Europediatrics 2006;236.
  17. Randomized trial of volume expansion with albumin or saline in children with severe malaria: Preliminary evidence of albumin benefit. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:538-45.
  18. Impact of PALS on Pediatric resuscitation knowledge. Asian J Pediatr Pract 2006;9:38-41.
  19. Improved outcomes associated with early resuscitation in septic shock: Do we need to resuscitate the patient or the physician? Pediatrics 2003;112:976-7.
  20. Essential Pediatrics. 6 th edition. New Delhi: CBS Distributors and publishers; 2004. p. 657-62.
  21. Shock. In: IAP Textbook of Pediatrics. 3 rd edition. New Delhi: JAYPEE; 2006. p. 906-12.
  22. IAP Specialty series on Pediatric Infectious Diseases. New Delhi: JAYPEE;2006. p. 13-29.
  23. Early development of Emergency Medicine in Chennai (Madras), India. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:604-8.
  24. Recognizing Emergency Medicine in India. Natl Med J India 2001;14:297-300.
  25. Ind Pediatr 2001;38:847-862.
  26. Sepsis and Septic Shock: Progress and Future considerations. Indian J Pediatr 2008;75:599-607
  27. A clinical profile of shock in children in Punjab, India. Indian Pediatr 2006;43:619-23.
  28. Adrenal status in children with septic shock using low dose stimulation test. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007;8:23-8.
  29. Predictors of multiple organ system failure and death in children with severe sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007;8:A59.
  30. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2008;36:296-327.
  31. Continuing education meetings and workshops: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001:CD003030
  32. Evaluation of resuscitation skills in new residents before and after pediatric advanced life support course. Pediatrics 2001;108:E110.
  33. Assessing pediatric senior residents′ training in resuscitation: Fund of knowledge, technical skills and perception of confidence. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000;16:73-76.
  34. Pediatricians′ evaluations of their residency curriculum in emergency medicine. Pediatr Emerg Care 2003;19:79-83.
  35. A survey of basic resuscitation knowledge among resident pediatricians. Arch Dis Child 1993;68:75-8.
  36. Pediatricians′ knowledge of cardiac arrest guidelines. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:47-9.
  37. A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:11-8.
  38. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27:10-28.
  39. S, Ranjit. S. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Course. New Delhi: JAYPEE Brothers, Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chennai; 2008.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.