Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 23 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study

Appu Suseel, Pallavi Panchu, Salish Varghese, Tijo George, Lijo Joy

Keywords : Basic life support, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Didactic, Manikins, Medical students, Simulation

Citation Information : Suseel A, Panchu P, Varghese S, George T, Joy L. An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019; 23 (11):509-512.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23284

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Introduction: Our current medical curriculum devotes a large percentage of time to knowledge acquisition by means of didactic lectures. Psychomotor skill acquisition takes a back seat. Certain lifesaving skills like basic life support skill training have not even made an appearance in the current curriculum. Equal time distribution to cognitive and psychomotor skills should be allotted for MBBS trainees, which is a very practical subject. Simulation can prove to be a valuable tool in imparting skill training. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different teaching modalities in imparting lifesaving skills among first-year MBBS students. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 33 first-year students who consented to participate. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. The students were divided into three groups, each undergoing either didactic lecture or animation-based videos or simulation studies. Pretest, posttest, and skills tests were administered to them. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t test were the statistical tests employed using SPSS version 21. Results: The pretest and posttest scores were comparable in the three groups while the improvement in the posttest scores in all the three groups was significant. The skills test was significantly better in the group undergoing simulation training compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Didactic, animation, and simulation are all good methods in imparting cognitive knowledge, but simulation is the method of choice in imparting psychomotor skills. Clinical significance: An overhauling of the medical curriculum to include more skills training to the budding doctors using simulation-based techniques is recommended.

  1. Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J, Berg RA, Billi JE, Bossaert L, Cassan P, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Inter American Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa). Circulation 2004;110(21):3385–3397.
  2. Bhanji F, Finn JC, Lockey A, Monsieurs K, Frengley R, Iwami T, et al. Part 8: Education, implementation, and teams: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2015;132(16_Suppl_1):S242–S268. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000277.
  3. Solymos O, O'Kelly P, Walshe CM. Pilot study comparing simulation-based and didactic lecture-based critical care teaching for final-year medical students. BMC Anesthesiol 2015;15(1):153. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-015-0109-6.
  4. Drews FA, Musters A, Markham B, Samore MH. Error producing conditions in the intensive care unit. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 51, No. 11, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2007; pp. 702–706.
  5. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 2013;35(1):e867–e898. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886.
  6. Semler MW, Keriwala RD, Clune JK, Rice TW, Pugh ME, Wheeler AP, et al. A randomized trial comparing didactics, demonstration, and simulation for teaching teamwork to medical residents. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12(4):512–519. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201501-030OC.
  7. Drews FA, Bakdash JZ. Simulation training in health care. Rev Hum Factors Ergonomics 2013;8(1):191–234. DOI: 10.1177/1557234X13492977.
  8. Kory PD, Eisen LA, Adachi M, Ribaudo VA, Rosenthal ME, Mayo PH. Initial airway management skills of senior residents: simulation training compared with traditional training. Chest 2007;132(6): 1927–1931. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-1554.
  9. Shapiro MJ, Morey JC, Small SD, Langford V, Kaylor CJ, Jagminas L, et al. Simulation based teamwork training for emergency department staff: does it improve clinical team performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum? Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(6):417–421. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2003.005447.
  10. Nestel D, Bearman M. Simulated patient methodology: theory, evidence and practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
  11. Ogden PE, Cobbs LS, Howell MR, Sibbitt SJ, DiPette DJ. Clinical simulation: importance to the internal medicine educational mission. Am J Med 2007;120(9):820–824. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.06.017.
  12. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132(Suppl 2):S414–S435. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259.
  13. Kolb DA. Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River:. Prentice Hall; 1984.
  14. Brady PW, Muething S, Kotagal U, Ashby M, Gallagher R, Hall D, et al. Improving situation awareness to reduce unrecognized clinical deterioration and serious safety events. Pediatrics 2013;131(1): e298–e308. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-1364.
  15. Ramsingh D, Alexander B, Le K, Williams W, Canales C, Cannesson M. Comparison of the didactic lecture with the simulation/model approach for the teaching of a novel perioperative ultrasound curriculum to anesthesiology residents. J Clin Anesthesia 2014;26(6): 443–454. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.01.018.
  16. Hallikainen J, Väisänen O, Randell T, Tarkkila P, Rosenberg PH, Niemi-Murola L. Teaching anaesthesia induction to medical students: comparison between full-scale simulation and supervised teaching in the operating theatre. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26(2):101–104. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831a6a76.
  17. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, McIlroy J, Devitt JH. Simulation technology: a comparison of experiential and visual learning for undergraduate medical students. Anesthesiology 2002;96(1):10–16. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200201000-00008.
  18. Wang CL, Schopp JG, Petscavage JM, Paladin AM, Richardson ML, Bush WH. Prospective randomized comparison of standard didactic lecture vs high-fidelity simulation for radiology resident contrast reaction management training. Am J Roentgenology 2011;196(6):1288–1295. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5618.
  19. Kunkler K. The role of medical simulation: an overview. Int J Med Robot Computer Assist Surg 2006;2(3):203–210. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.101.
  20. Supramaniam PR, Mittal M, Davies R, Lim LN, Arambage K. Didactic lectures vs simulation training: a randomised pilot evaluation of its impact on surgical skill. Gynecol Surg 2018;15(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s10397-018-1053-5.
  21. Schon D. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Temple smith; 1983.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.