Background: The aim of this review is to evaluate the global scientific literature on the utility of plasma presepsin (PSP) as a prognostic biomarker in a homogeneous group of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive cases.
Data retrieval: A systematic review utilizing Medline (PubMed interface), LitCovid NLM, World Health Organization (WHO)–global literature on coronavirus disease, and EBSCO CINAHL Plus was undertaken. The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) group guidelines. The quality of individual evidence and possible risk of bias were assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. A narrative synthesis-based conclusion was compiled.
Results: A total of three articles passed through the predefined screening criteria and were included in the review. Methodological quality was evaluated to be acceptable. The aggregate study population was summed up to be 167 COVID-19 positive cases, who had undergone analysis of plasma PSP levels for the prediction of severity and mortality. Based on different PSP cutoffs utilized, a statistically significant association between PSP and COVID-19 severity was reported.
Conclusion: PSP appears as a promising prognostic biomarker of COVID-19 progression. As data are scarce on its utility, large cross-sectional studies are needed.
Ahmed S, Jafri L, Majid H, Khan AH, Ghani F, Siddiqui I. Challenges amid COVID-19 times - review of the changing practices in a clinical chemistry laboratory from a developing country. Ann Med Surg 2020;55:300–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.004.
Wu YC, Chen CS, Chan YJ. The outbreak of COVID-19: an overview. J Chin Med Assoc 2020;83(3):217–220. DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000270.
Fukada A, Kitagawa Y, Matsuoka M, Sakai J, Imai K, Tarumoto N, et al. Presepsin as a predictive biomarker of severity in COVID-19: a case series. J Med Virol 2021;93(1):99–101. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26164.
Presepsin – Mechanism. Available from: http://presepsin.com/mechanism.html [Accessed March 12, 2021].
Osman AS, Awadallah MG, Tabl HA, Abed NT, Goudah ES. Presepsin as a novel diagnostic marker in neonatal septicemia. Egypt J Med Microbiol 2015;38(3174):1–6. DOI: 10.12816/0024924.
Shozushima T, Takahashi G, Matsumoto M, Kojika M, Okamura Y, Endo S. Usefulness of presepsin (sCD14-ST) measurements as a marker for the diagnosis and severity of sepsis that satisfied diagnostic criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Infect Chemother 2011;17(6):764–769. DOI: 10.1007/s10156-011-0254-x.
Okamura Y, Yokoi H. Development of a point-of-care assay system for measurement of presepsin (sCD14-ST). Clin Chim Acta 2011;412 (23–24):2157–2161. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.024.
Ugajin M, Matsuura Y, Matsuura K, Matsuura H. Impact of initial plasma presepsin level for clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. J Thorac Dis 2019;11(4):1387–1396. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.74.
Zaninotto M, Mion MM, Cosma C, Rinaldi D, Plebani M. Presepsin in risk stratification of SARS-CoV-2 patients. Clin Chim Acta 2020;507:161–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.020.
Ham JY, Song KE. A prospective study of presepsin as an indicator of the severity of community-acquired pneumonia in emergency departments: comparison with pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 scores. Lab Med 2019;50(4):364–369. DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmz005.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8(5):336–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310.
Hayden JA, Cote P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 2006;144(6): 427–437. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010.
Schirinzi A, Cazzolla AP, Lovero R, Lo Muzio L, Testa NF, Ciavarella D, et al. New insights in laboratory testing for COVID-19 patients: looking for the role and predictive value of Human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) and the innate immunity of the oral cavity and respiratory tract. Microorganisms 2020;8(11):1718. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8111718.
Wu J, Hu L, Zhang G, Wu F, He T. Accuracy of presepsin in sepsis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0133057. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133057.
Wu CC, Lan HM, Han ST, Chaou CH, Yeh CF, Liu SH, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intens Care 2017;7(1):1–6. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-017-0316-z.
Iskandar A, Arthamin MZ, Indriana K, Anshory M, Hur M, Di Somma S, GREAT Network. Comparison between presepsin and procalcitonin in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;32(23):3903–3908. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1475643.
Abdelshafey EE, Nasa P, Elgohary AE, Khalil MF, Rashwan MA, Ghezala HB, et al. Role of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis and ICU mortality: a prospective controlled study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):153. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23715.
Azim A. Presepsin: a promising biomarker for sepsis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):117. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23741.
Ahmed S, Jafri L, Hoodbhoy Z, Siddiqui I. Prognostic value of serum procalcitonin in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):77. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23706.
Savio RD. Procalcitonin (in COVID-19): the incessant quest. Indian J Crit Care Medicine 2021;25(1):1. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23698.
Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Trabattoni E, Roelens M, Borderie D, Claessens YE. Presepsin (sCD14-ST) in emergency department: the need for adapted threshold values? Clin Chim Acta 2014;427:34–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.019.