Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 28 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2024 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Evaluation of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positive Flagged Blood Cultures in Sepsis Patients

Vikramjeet Singh, Jyotsna Agarwal, Soumya S Nath, Avneesh Sharma

Keywords : Categorical agreement, Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Enterobacterales, Essential agreement, Flagged blood culture, Gram-positive bacteria, Non-fermenters, Time to release report

Citation Information : Singh V, Agarwal J, Nath SS, Sharma A. Evaluation of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positive Flagged Blood Cultures in Sepsis Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024; 28 (4):387-392.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24687

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-03-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Presently, many laboratories are equipped with automated system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for minimum inhibitory concentration-based reporting which enables the clinician to choose the right antimicrobial for timely treatment of sepsis. The study aimed to assess performance of direct AST from blood culture positive broth using automated AST system for accuracy and time taken to release the report. Materials and methods: The present study conducted in a 25-bedded ICU in North India for 12 months. Single morphotype of bacteria on gram stain from positively flagged blood culture bottles were included, which was directly identified (using an in-house protocol) with MALDI-TOF-MS from positive blood culture broths. DAST was carried out from 200 such blood culture broths and results were compared with reference AST (RAST) which was also done using VITEK-2 using overnight grown bacterial colonies as per standard protocol. Results: Among 60 isolates of Enterobacterales, 99% categorical agreement for both E. coli and K. pneumoniae observed by two methods were tested for AST. Among non-fermenters, Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed a categorical agreement of 99.6%, as compared with Acinetobacter spp. and exotic GNBs, which showed 95–96% agreement. A significant difference of 18–24 hours was noted in time to release the report between DAST and RAST, for GNB and GPC both. Conclusion: Direct AST from positive flagged blood culture bottles can significantly reduce the time to release the bacterial susceptibility report by up to 24 hours, at the same time maintaining the accuracy.

Supplementary File


PDF Share
  1. Rajni E, Garg VK, Bacchani D, Sharma R, Vohra R, Mamoria V, et al. Prevalence of bloodstream infections and their etiology in COVID-19 patients admitted in a tertiary care hospital in Jaipur. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):369–373. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23781.
  2. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395(10219):200–211. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
  3. Tjandra KC, Ram-Mohan N, Abe R, Hashemi MM, Lee JH, Chin SM, et al. Diagnosis of bloodstream infections: An evolution of technologies towards accurate and rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022;11(4):511. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11040511.
  4. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021;47(11):1181–1247. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.
  5. Duncan CF, Youngstein T, Kirrane MD, Lonsdale DO. Diagnostic Challenges in Sepsis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2021;23(12):22. DOI: 10.1007/s11908-021-00765-y.
  6. Hogan CA, Watz N, Budvytiene I, Banaei N. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by VITEK®2 directly from blood cultures in patients with Gram-negative rod bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2019;94(2):116–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.01.001.
  7. Agarwal J, Singh V, Das A, Nath SS, Kumar R, Sen M. Reversing the trend of antimicrobial resistance in icu: Role of antimicrobial and diagnostic Stewardship. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(6):635–641. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23861.
  8. Kavipriya D, Prakash SS, Dhandapani S, Rajshekar D, Sastry AS. Evaluation of the performance of direct susceptibility test by VITEK-2 from positively flagged blood culture broth for gram-negative bacilli. J Lab Physicians 2021;13(4):374–379. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732489.
  9. Rajshekar D, Chaudhari KV, Bhat P, Prakash SS, Raghvan R, Vasanth S, et al. Evaluation of performance of direct disk diffusion test from positively flagged blood culture broth: A large scale study from South India. J Lab Physicians 2019;11(2):154–160. DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_137_18.
  10. Kumar M, Shergill SPS, Tandel K, Sahai K, Gupta RM. Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing from positive blood culture bottles in laboratories lacking automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems. Med J Armed Forces India 2019;75(4):450–457. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.08.010.
  11. Hazelton B, Thomas LC, Olma T, Kok J, O'Sullivan M, Chen SCA, et al. Rapid and accurate direct antibiotic susceptibility testing of blood culture broths using MALDI Sepsityper combined with the BD Phoenix automated system. J Med Microbiol 2014;63(Pt12): 1590–1594. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.075580-0.
  12. ISO 20776–1:2006 Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems. Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices—part 2: Evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/41631.html.
  13. Jorgensen JH. Selection criteria for an antimicrobial susceptibility testing system. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31(11):2841–2844. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.2841-2844.1993.
  14. Heather CS, Maley M. Automated direct screening for resistance of Gram-negative blood cultures using the BD KiestraWork Cell. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2018;37(1):117–125. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-3109-2.
  15. Coyle MB, McGonagle LA, Plorde JJ, Clausen CR, Schoenknecht FD. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests. J Clin Microbiol 1984;20(3):473–477. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.473-477.1984.
  16. Coorevits L, Boelens J, Claeys G. Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: A rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015;34(6):1207–1212. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-015-2349-2.
  17. Barnini S, Brucculeri V, Morici P, Ghelardi E, Florio W, Lupetti A. A new rapid method for direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from positive blood cultures. BMC Microbiol 2016;16(1):185. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0805-5.
  18. Mauri C, Principe L, Bracco S, Meroni E, Corbo N, Pini B, et al. Identification by mass spectrometry and automated susceptibility testing from positive bottles: A simple, rapid, and standardized approach to reduce the turnaround time in the management of blood cultures. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17(1):749. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2851-5.
  19. Pan HW, Li W, Li RG, Li Y, Zhang Y, Sun EH. Simple sample preparation method for direct microbial identification and susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures. Front Microbiol 2018;9:481. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00481.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.