Combined Effect of the Timing of Initiation of Nutrition and Nutrition Risk on Outcomes in a Mixed Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital in a Middle-income Country
Moses Siaw-Frimpong, Pritish J Korula, Reka Karuppusami, Nana F Gyapon, Kandasamy Subramani, Rajendran U Chander, Shoma Rao, William Addison
Citation Information :
Siaw-Frimpong M, Korula PJ, Karuppusami R, Gyapon NF, Subramani K, Chander RU, Rao S, Addison W. Combined Effect of the Timing of Initiation of Nutrition and Nutrition Risk on Outcomes in a Mixed Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital in a Middle-income Country. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025; 29 (2):137-142.
Background: The importance of nutrition in the critically ill is well known but its practice is varied globally. Determining the nutrition risk is important to help improve outcomes.
Materials and methods: A prospective observational study involved patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who stayed for at least 48 hours. The demographics of participants modified the NUTRIC score, and comorbidities were assessed. The timing of nutrition initiation was noted to get two main cohorts: Early (within 48 hours of admission) and delayed (after 48 hours of admission). All the patients were followed for a maximum of 30 days in the hospital to determine outcome variables such as mortality and length of hospital stay. The ICU-free days (30 minus days in ICU) and 30-day hospital-free days were calculated and recorded for each patient.
Results: A total of 489 patients, 59.9% were males, 75.5% were mechanically ventilated and total parenteral nutrition utilization was 13.2%. The prevalence of nutrition risk was 21.1%. The patients who had early nutrition constituted 36.6%. There was no difference in the primary outcome of ICU-free days between the two groups; 24 (19–25.5) and 24 (16–25) days, respectively; p = 0.591. The high modified NUTRIC score cohort had lower ICU-free days (p < 0.001), 30-day hospital-free days, and higher mortality; 18 (0–24) vs 25 days (20–26), p < 0.001.
Conclusion: The timing of the initiation of nutrition does not affect ICU-free days and 30-day hospital-free days irrespective of the nutrition risk on admission. A high modified NUTRIC score is associated with reduced ICU-free days and 30-day hospital-free days and increased mortality.
Sim J, Hong J, Na EM, Doo S, Jung YT. Early supplemental parenteral nutrition is associated with reduced mortality in critically ill surgical patients with high nutritional risk. Clin Nutr 2021;40(12):5678–5683. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.10.008.
Tian F, Heighes PT, Allingstrup MJ, Doig GS. Early enteral nutrition provided within 24 hours of ICU admission: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials*. Crit Care Med 2018;46(7):1049. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003152.
Desai SV, McClave SA, Rice TW. Nutrition in the ICU: An evidence-based approach. Chest 2014;145(5):1148–1157. DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-1158.
Hiesmayr M. Nutrition risk assessment in the ICU. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2012;15(2):174. DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328350767e.
Domenech-Briz V, Gea-Caballero V, Czapla M, Chover-Sierra E, Juárez-Vela R, Arnedo IS, et al. Importance of nutritional assessment tools in the critically ill patient: A systematic review. Front Nutr 2023;9. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1073782.
Mukhopadhyay A, Henry J, Ong V, Shu-Fen Leong C, Teh AL, van Dam RM, et al. Association of modified NUTRIC score with 28-day mortality in critically ill patients. Clin Nutr 2017;36(4):1143–1148. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.08.004.
Mahmoodpoor A, Sanaie S, Sarfaraz T, Shadvar K, Fattahi V, Hamishekar H, et al. Prognostic values of modified NUTRIC score to assess outcomes in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care units: Prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2023;23:131. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02086-0.
Rahman A, Hasan RM, Agarwala R, Martin C, Day AG, Heyland DK. Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: Further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool. Clin Nutr 2016;35(1):158–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.015.
Moubarez DA. The modified NUTRIC score as a predictor of 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care 2023;10(4):378. DOI: 10.4103/roaic.roaic_28_23.
Wełna M, Adamik B, Kübler A, Goździk W. The NUTRIC score as a tool to predict mortality and increased resource utilization in intensive care patients with sepsis. Nutrients 2023;15(7):1648. DOI: 10.3390/nu15071648.
Ibrahim DA, Elkabarity RH, Moustafa ME, El-Gendy HA. Modified NUTRIC score and outcomes in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis. Egypt J Anaesth 2020;36(1):288–296. DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2020.1848240.
Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, Jeejeebhoy K, Day AG, Dhaliwal R, et al. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: Results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med 2009;35(10):1728–1737. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4.
Heyland D, Schroter-Noppe D, Drover J, Jain M, Keefe L, Dhaliwal R, et al. Nutrition support in the critical care setting: Current practice in Canadian ICUs opportunities for improvement? J Parenter Enter Nutr 2003;27(1):74–83. DOI: 10.1177/014860710302700174.
Dobson K, Scott A. Review of ICU nutrition support practices: Implementing the nurse-led enteral feeding algorithm. Nurs Crit Care 2007;12(3):114–123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00222.x.
Murthy TA, Rangappa P, Anil BJ, Jacob I, Rao K. Postoperative nutrition practices in abdominal surgery patients in a tertiary referral hospital Intensive Care Unit: A prospective analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2016;20(6):319. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.183910.
Ramakrishnan N, Shankar B, Ranganathan L, Daphnee DK, Bharadwaj A, Venkataraman R. Parenteral nutrition support: Beyond gut feeling? Quality control study of parenteral nutrition practices in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med 2016;20(1):36. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.173687.
Wang N, Wang MP, Jiang L, Du B, Zhu B, Xi XM. Association between the modified nutrition risk in critically ill (mNUTRIC) score and clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit: A secondary analysis of a large prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2021;21:220. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01439-x.
Kalaiselvan MS, Renuka MK, Arunkumar AS. Use of nutrition risk in critically ill (NUTRIC) score to assess nutritional risk in mechanically ventilated patients: A prospective observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2017;21(5):253–256. DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_24_17.
Chakravarty C, Hazarika B, Goswami L, Ramasubban S. Prevalence of malnutrition in a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2013;17(3):170–173. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.117058.
Ojo O, Ojo OO, Feng Q, Boateng J, Wang X, Brooke J, et al. The effects of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2022;14(5):1120. DOI: 10.3390/nu14051120.
Padilla PF, Martínez G, Vernooij RW, Urrútia G, Figuls MRI, Cosp XB. Early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 hours) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2019(10):CD012340. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012340.pub2.
Compher C, Bingham AL, McCall M, Patel J, Rice TW, C, et al. Guidelines for the provision of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. J Parenter Enter Nutr 2022;46(1):12–41. DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2267.
Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Calder PC, Casaer M, Hiesmayr M, et al. ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr 2023;42(9):1671–1689. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.011.
Ramakrishnan N, Shankar B, Ranganathan L, Daphnee DK, Bharadwaj A, Venkataraman R. Parenteral nutrition support: Beyond gut feeling? Quality control study of parenteral nutrition practices in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med 2016;20(1):36–39. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.173687.