Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 29 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2025 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Peripheral Perfusion Index for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Jayaprakash Narayanan B, Shoma V Rao, Subramani Kandasamy

Keywords : Fluid responsiveness, Fluid resuscitation, Hemodynamic instability, Intensive care unit, Noninvasive blood pressure, Peripheral Perfusion Index, Pulse oximetry, Pleth variability index monitoring, Shock, Spontaneous ventilation

Citation Information : B JN, Rao SV, Kandasamy S. Peripheral Perfusion Index for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025; 29 (2):151-154.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24898

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-01-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Peripheral perfusion index (PPI), measured via plethysmography using a pulse oximeter, provides noninvasive, continuous insights into peripheral circulation. This study evaluates PPI's potential as a predictive marker for fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients, aiming to reduce vasopressor use. Methods: A 20-month prospective study was conducted in the multidisciplinary surgical ICU of Christian Medical College, Vellore. Patients meeting specific inclusion criteria were enrolled. Parameters including blood pressure, pulse pressure (PP), heart rate, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI), oxygen saturation, and PPI were recorded before and after a passive leg raise (PLR) test. Positive PLR responders received fluid resuscitation, and PPI changes were monitored at regular intervals. The study excluded patients with peripheral vascular disease, burns involving extremities, those on nitroglycerin or other vasodilator infusions, and those on high doses of vasopressors. Results: A 39% increase in PPI was identified as the threshold for fluid responsiveness. Subgroup analysis revealed variability: trauma patients showed a 55% increase, obstetrics patients 41%, and postoperative patients 6%. Notably, the study found that spontaneous breathing and minimal vasopressor requirements enhanced the reliability of PPI as a fluid responsiveness marker. Conclusion: Peripheral perfusion index is a reliable and practical tool for predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients. It offers a noninvasive and dynamic method to guide volume resuscitation, particularly when combined with established hemodynamic markers such as LVOT VTI and PP changes. This study underscores the importance of using PPI in conjunction with other parameters for comprehensive fluid management. Further validation in larger and more diverse patient populations is warranted to confirm these findings and optimize resuscitation strategies.


PDF Share
  1. Lima AP, Beelen P, Bakker J. Use of a peripheral perfusion index derived from the pulse oximetry signal as a non-invasive indicator of perfusion. Crit Care Med 2002;30(6):1210–1213. DOI:10.1097/00003246-200206000-00025.
  2. Højlund J, Agerskov M, Clemmesen CG, Hvolris LE, Foss NB. The peripheral perfusion index tracks systemic haemodynamics during general anaesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput 2020;34(6):1177–1184. DOI:10.1007/s10877-020-00489-2.
  3. van Genderen ME, Bartels SA, Lima A, Bezemer R, Ince C, Bakker J, et al. Peripheral perfusion index as an early predictor for central hypovolemia in awake healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 2013;116(2):351–356. DOI:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318271f6f3.
  4. Klijn E, Groeneveld AB, van Genderen ME, Betjes M, Bakker J, van Bommel J. Peripheral perfusion index predicts hypotension during fluid withdrawal by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in critically ill patients. Blood Purif 2015;40(1):92–98. DOI:10.1159/000441541.
  5. Kroese JK, van Vonderen JJ, Narayen IC, Walther FJ, Hooper S, te Pas AB. The perfusion index of healthy term infants during transition at birth. Eur J Pediatr 2016;175(4):475–479. DOI:10.1007/s00431-015-2667-8.
  6. Shi X, Xu M, Yu X, Lu Y. Peripheral perfusion index predicting prolonged ICU stay earlier and better than lactate in surgical patients: An observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2020;20(1):153. DOI:10.1186/s12871-020-01068-4.
  7. Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, et al. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27(6):555–561. DOI:10.1097/EJA.0b013e328338f610.
  8. Broch O, Bein B, Gruenewald M, Höcker J, Schöttler J, Meybohm P, et al. Accuracy of the pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness depends on the perfusion index. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011;55(6):686–693. DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02427. x.
  9. Desgranges FP, Desebbe O, Ghazouani A, Gilbert K, Keller G, Chiari P, et al. Influence of the site of measurement on the ability of plethysmographic variability index to predict fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2011;107(3):329–335. DOI:10.1093/bja/aer185.
  10. Shi R, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Parameters of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2020;26(3):319–326. DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000716.
  11. Sebastiani A, Philippi L, Boehme S, Closhen D, Scherhag A, Markstaller K, et al. Perfusion index and plethysmographic variability index in patients with interscalene nerve catheters. Can J Anaesth 2012;59(12):1095–1101. DOI:10.1007/s12630-012-9774-8.
  12. Monnet X, Guerin L, Jozwiak M, Bataille A, Julien F, Richard C, et al. Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anaesth 2013;110(2):207–213. DOI:10.1093/bja/aes384.
  13. Hong DM, Lee JM, Seo JH, Min JJ, Jeon Y, Bahk JH. Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: Tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing. Anaesthesia 2014;69(7):717–722. DOI:10.1111/anae.12730.
  14. Bapteste L, Carrillon R, Javelier S, Guyotat J, Desgranges FP, Lehot JJ, et al. Pulse Pressure variations and plethysmographic variability index measured at ear are able to predict fluid responsiveness in the sitting position for neurosurgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2020;32(3):263-267. DOI:10.1097/ANA.0000000000000615.
  15. Godai K, Matsunaga A, Kanmura Y. The effects of hemodynamic management using the trend of the perfusion index and pulse pressure variation on tissue perfusion: A randomized pilot study. JA Clin Rep 2019;5(1):72. DOI:10.1186/s40981-019-0270-4.
  16. Rao SS, Lalitha AV, Reddy M, Ghosh S. Electrocardiometry for hemodynamic categorization and assessment of fluid responsiveness in pediatric septic shock: A pilot observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):185–192. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23730.
  17. Jayaprakash D, Subramanian S, Rajesh R, Srinivasan S. Predictive value of peripheral perfusion index in assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: A prospective observational study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(1):45–50. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24145.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.