Sepsis poses a significant global health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Several aspects of sepsis management recommended in international guidelines are often difficult or impossible to implement in resource-limited settings (RLS) due to issues related to cost, infrastructure, or lack of trained healthcare workers. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) drafted a position statement for the management of sepsis in RLS focusing on India, facilitated by a task force of 18 intensivists using a Delphi process, to achieve consensus on various aspects of sepsis management which are challenging to implement in RLS. The process involved a comprehensive literature review, controlled feedback, and four iterative surveys conducted between 21 August 2023 and 21 September 2023. The domains addressed in the Delphi process included the need for a position statement, challenges in sepsis management, considerations for diagnosis, patient management while awaiting an intensive care unit (ICU) bed, and treatment of sepsis and septic shock in RLS. Consensus was achieved when 70% or more of the task force members voted either for or against statements using a Likert scale or a multiple-choice question (MCQ). The Delphi process with 100% participation of Task Force members in all rounds, generated consensus in 32 statements (91%) from which 20 clinical practice statements were drafted for the management of sepsis in RLS. The clinical practice statements will complement the existing international guidelines for the management of sepsis and provide valuable insights into tailoring sepsis interventions in the context of RLS, contributing to the global discourse on sepsis management. Future international guidelines should address the management of sepsis in RLS.

Rationale: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) are an emerging problem owing to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, immunosuppressive agents, and frequency of indwelling catheters. Timely diagnosis which is imperative to improve outcomes can be challenging. This position statement is aimed at understanding risk factors, providing a rational diagnostic approach, and guiding clinicians to optimize antifungal therapy. Objectives: To update evidence on epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic approach, antifungal initiation strategy, therapeutic interventions including site-specific infections and role of therapeutic drug monitoring in IFI in ICU and focus on some practice points relevant to these domains. Methodology: A committee comprising critical care specialists across the country was formed and specific aspects of fungal infections and antifungal treatment were assigned to each member. They extensively reviewed the literature including the electronic databases and the international guidelines and cross-references. The information was shared and discussed over several meetings and position statements were framed to ensure their reliability and relevance in critical practice. The draft document was prepared after obtaining inputs and consensus from all the members and was reviewed by an expert in this field. Results: The existing evidence on the management of IFI was updated and practice points were prepared under each subheading to enable critical care practitioners to streamline diagnosis and treatment strategies for patients in the ICU with additional detail on site-specific infections therapeutic drug monitoring. Conclusion: This position statement attempts to address the management of IFI in immunocompetent and non-neutropenic ICU patients. The practice points should guide in optimization of the management of critically ill patients with suspected or proven fungal infections.

Dengue is one of the commonest causes of undifferentiated acute febrile illness in India as well as South East Asia. Nearly two-fifths of the world population is at risk of infection, and nearly 96 million infections reported worldwide, it is a major cause of concern across the globe. The ISCCM leadership felt that there have been no new directives/guidelines except the MOH guidelines for the management of dengue fever since 2014. Under the auspices of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), an expert group of 14 intensivists from across the country, was formed. The task force members formulated questions that needed to be answered. These questions were validated by the members of ISCCM attending research conclave 2023. All the members systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Science Direct for original articles on different aspects of dengue management between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2023. From the collected articles, duplicates were removed. Based on the evidence collected, the expert group members prepared statements/answers to the questions. Since most of the evidence is of moderate to low quality, a consensus was generated amongst the members of the task force. Each statement was agreed upon by 70% of the task force. The statements presented in the article are consensus statements as answers to queries raised.

Malaria is a worldwide health concern, but a great majority of cases occur in tropical countries like India. With almost 95% of Indian population living in malaria endemic regions, India contributes to most of the global malaria cases and deaths, outside of African countries. Despite significant advances towards malaria control and eradication, mortality associated with severe malaria remains particularly high. Changing epidemiology, vulnerable patient population, overlapping symptomatology, and limited availability of parenteral preparations of artemisinin derivatives pose significant challenges in management of severe malaria. Further, the dearth of large-scale randomized trials from the developing countries makes it difficult to establish evidence-based guidelines pertaining to their situation. Thus, this position paper aims to provide guidance to critical care physicians across the country on managing patients with severe malaria in intensive care units (ICUs).

Tuberculosis (TB) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality globally. About 3–4% of hospitalized TB patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU); the mortality in these patients is around 50–60%. There is limited literature on the evaluation and management of patients with TB who required ICU admission. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) constituted a working group to develop a position paper that provides recommendations on the various aspects of TB in the ICU setting based on available evidence. Seven domains were identified including the categorization of TB in the critically ill, diagnostic workup, drug therapy, TB in the immunocompromised host, organ support, infection control, and post-TB sequelae. Forty-one questions pertaining to these domains were identified and evidence-based position statements were generated, where available, keeping in focus the critical care aspects. Where evidence was not available, the recommendations were based on consensus. This position paper guides the approach to and management of critically ill patients with TB.

This position statement reviews the evidence and rationale for the management of severe peripartum infections with a special focus on tropical infections and is tailored for resource-limited settings.

Poisoning and its aftermath are globally observed and acknowledged concerns. India has a large burden of “self-harm/suicides” with 12.4/per 100,000 population committing suicide. Consumption of poisonous substances is the second most common mode of self-harm in India. Patients present to both public and private institutions in a critically ill state. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) and Indian College of Critical Care Medicine (ICCCM) decided to address common and contentious issues related to poisoning by developing a position statement that is expected to be appropriate in the Indian scenario by the constitution of an “expert group” to provide a “set of statements” aimed at addressing the common issues faced by intensivists in their practice in managing such patients. The structured approach, framework, and process adopted in developing the position statement on the approach to poisoning have been detailed in this statement. The formation of an expert advisory panel was followed by a literature search, and multiple sessions of consensus-building exercises to reach the current statement presented below. The statement consists of relevant questions with possible answers thereof. Each answer was further weighed against the data and evidence available in the literature. Recommendations were made using a simplified score to make the statement qualitatively meaningful.

Background and purpose: Weaning from a mechanical ventilator is a milestone in the recovery of seriously ill patients in Intensive care. Failure to wean and re-intubation adversely affects the outcome. The method of mechanical ventilation (MV) varies between different ICUs and so does the practice of weaning. Therefore, updated guidelines based on contemporary literature are designed to guide intensivists in modern ICUs. This is the first ISCCM Consensus Statement on weaning complied by a committee on weaning. The recommendations are intended to be used by all the members of the ICU (Intensivists, Registrars, Nurses, and Respiratory Therapists). Methods: A Committee on weaning from MV, formed by the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) has formulated this statement on weaning from mechanical ventilators in intensive care units (ICUs) after a review of the literature. Literature was first circulated among expert committee members and allotted sections to each member. Sections of the statement written by sectional authors were peer-reviewed on multiple occasions through virtual meetings. After the final manuscript is accepted by all the committee members, it is submitted for peer review by central guideline committee of ISCCM. Once approved it has passed through review by the Editorial Board of IJCCM before it is published here as “ISCCM consensus statement on weaning from mechanical ventilator”. As per the standard accepted for all its guidelines of ISCCM, we followed the modified grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system to classify the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Cost–benefit, risk-benefit analysis, and feasibility of implementation in Indian ICUs are considered by the committee along with the strength of evidence. Type of ventilators and their modes, ICU staffing pattern, availability of critical care nurses, Respiratory therapists, and day vs night time staffing are aspects considered while recommending for or against any aspect of weaning. Result: This document makes recommendation on various aspects of weaning, namely, definition, timing, weaning criteria, method of weaning, diagnosis of failure to wean, defining difficult to wean, Use of NIV, HFOV as adjunct to weaning, role of tracheostomy in weaning, weaning in of long term ventilated patients, role of physiotherapy, mobilization in weaning, Role of nutrition in weaning, role of diaphragmatic ultrasound in weaning prediction etc. Out of 42 questions addressed; the committee provided 39 recommendations and refrained from 3 questions. Of these 39; 32 are based on evidence and 7 are based on expert opinion of the committee members. It provides 27 strong recommendations and 12 weak recommendations (suggestions). Conclusion: This guideline gives extensive review on weaning from mechanical ventilator and provides various recommendations on weaning from mechanical ventilator. Though all efforts are made to make is as updated as possible one needs to review any guideline periodically to keep it in line with upcoming concepts and standards.

This position statement is documented based on the input from all contributing coauthors from the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), following a comprehensive literature review and summary of current scientific evidence. Its objective is to provide the standard perspective for the management of potential organ/tissue donors after brain death (BD) in adults only, regardless of the availability of technology. This document should only be used for guidance only and is not a substitute for proper clinical decision making in particular circumstances of any case. Endorsement by the ISCCM does not imply that the statements given in the document are applicable in all or in a particular case; however, they may provide guidance for the users thus facilitating maximum organ availability from brain-dead patients. Thus, the care of potential brain-dead organ donors is “caring for multiple recipients.”

Gender disparity in Critical Care Medicine (CCM) persists globally, with women being underrepresented. Female Intensivists remain a minority, facing challenges in academic and leadership positions at the workplace and within academic societies. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) recognized the need for addressing issues related to gender parity and constituted its first Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Committee in 2023. Through a Delphi process involving 38 Panelists including 53% women, consensus and stability were achieved for 18 statements (95%). From these 18 consensus statements, 15 position statements were drafted to address gender balance issues in CCM. These statements advocate for equal opportunities in recruitment, workplace inclusivity, prevention of harassment, and improved female representation in leadership roles, nominated positions, and conferences. While the consensus reflects a significant step toward gender equity, further efforts are required to implement, advocate, and evaluate the impact of these measures. The ISCCM position statements offer valuable guidance for promoting gender balance within society and the CCM community.